Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
100 % medical release
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dannyboy" data-source="post: 80725" data-attributes="member: 484"><p>Not ill here. Just a simple comment on the fact that in the Bible, satan used the Bible to his ends to achieve his goal. I said nothing more, nothing less.</p><p> </p><p>Except that management uses and quotes the contract, many times out of context, to achieve their goals.</p><p> </p><p>But as a practical matter, the whole thing was written as vague as our tax code, and for a reason. </p><p> </p><p>And my thoughts are that Casey was smart enough to understand that whatever the cost of bringing in the union, it was far cheaper than to let internal workings find their way into the court systems.</p><p> </p><p>But since you did bring it up. there are times when in negotiations that there is give and take. I have seen where the company has had one person that they wanted rid of very badly. So in say 7 termination hearings, deals were made where the 6 other people get only token suspensions, but the one they want rid of gets to hit the road. </p><p> </p><p>Not really the best way, but it works. And the union, eager to get the best deal for the greatest number of filers, is trying to get the best picture for the group. So it allows the one to get fired, while bringing back the other 6 for sure. It is in cases like the above where the contract did not, repeat not, serve the correct function. And that is why, until the process has completed, legal advice is not allowed.</p><p> </p><p>In the case of violations of federal law, these are issues that are not covered in the contract, but the contract alludes submission to the law. So the employee seeks to clear the issue with the employer, and the employers counsel. So if the employer has staff counsel to handle issues outside the contract, why should not the employee. That goes against everything American that you hold so dear. Equal representation.</p><p> </p><p>And just because you dont like the lawyers that the employee has to choose from does not make them bad, or the ones you have on staff good.</p><p> </p><p>As for Micheal learning something of value here, I really think that would be a stretch. </p><p> </p><p>Lemme see your judgeship, I got this information on a non authorized chat site on the internet called brown caf. While I realize it has no legal ties to UPS, there were several statements that were made that obligates UPS to take care of my client. These statements were made by what we think were very high ranking UPS corp managers, and it proves that UPS is clearly intentionally violating my clients rights. These orders came from the highest levels, the corp VP named Tie guy.</p><p> </p><p>Yeah that would be a good one. I bet he wins.<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/lol.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Lol :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /> </p><p> </p><p>Not</p><p> </p><p>As for passion, that is one thing I have never lost. And one thing UPS could not take away. That is also what makes me a formidable opponent, even when I am on the lost cause side of an issue.</p><p> </p><p>Regards</p><p> </p><p>d</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dannyboy, post: 80725, member: 484"] Not ill here. Just a simple comment on the fact that in the Bible, satan used the Bible to his ends to achieve his goal. I said nothing more, nothing less. Except that management uses and quotes the contract, many times out of context, to achieve their goals. But as a practical matter, the whole thing was written as vague as our tax code, and for a reason. And my thoughts are that Casey was smart enough to understand that whatever the cost of bringing in the union, it was far cheaper than to let internal workings find their way into the court systems. But since you did bring it up. there are times when in negotiations that there is give and take. I have seen where the company has had one person that they wanted rid of very badly. So in say 7 termination hearings, deals were made where the 6 other people get only token suspensions, but the one they want rid of gets to hit the road. Not really the best way, but it works. And the union, eager to get the best deal for the greatest number of filers, is trying to get the best picture for the group. So it allows the one to get fired, while bringing back the other 6 for sure. It is in cases like the above where the contract did not, repeat not, serve the correct function. And that is why, until the process has completed, legal advice is not allowed. In the case of violations of federal law, these are issues that are not covered in the contract, but the contract alludes submission to the law. So the employee seeks to clear the issue with the employer, and the employers counsel. So if the employer has staff counsel to handle issues outside the contract, why should not the employee. That goes against everything American that you hold so dear. Equal representation. And just because you dont like the lawyers that the employee has to choose from does not make them bad, or the ones you have on staff good. As for Micheal learning something of value here, I really think that would be a stretch. Lemme see your judgeship, I got this information on a non authorized chat site on the internet called brown caf. While I realize it has no legal ties to UPS, there were several statements that were made that obligates UPS to take care of my client. These statements were made by what we think were very high ranking UPS corp managers, and it proves that UPS is clearly intentionally violating my clients rights. These orders came from the highest levels, the corp VP named Tie guy. Yeah that would be a good one. I bet he wins.:lol: Not As for passion, that is one thing I have never lost. And one thing UPS could not take away. That is also what makes me a formidable opponent, even when I am on the lost cause side of an issue. Regards d [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
100 % medical release
Top