Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
22.3 Pay rate question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gandydancer" data-source="post: 418552" data-attributes="member: 9310"><p>No, he's not. He's a ft employee who works two shifts, in each of which he performs a task that would ordinarily be a part time job. If Baba Gounj is indeed getting a part time rate he must have been red lined. I doubt if progression was waived -- if he was deemed a should-have-been-'98 in 2000 he was given credit for two years progression as a make-whole. I'm not exactly sure where it says that Article 40 work is paid at Article 40 rates rather than 22.3 rates when performed by a 22.3, but it must be in there somewhere because that's the case everywhere, so far as I've seen. Anyway, I suspect the key is that 22.3 jobs that include inside tasks and Article 40 work are not deemed to be "combination jobs" as a matter of the intent and understanding of the parties. And I think it's in our rider that the Union is the only party with standing to pursue a grievance.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gandydancer, post: 418552, member: 9310"] No, he's not. He's a ft employee who works two shifts, in each of which he performs a task that would ordinarily be a part time job. If Baba Gounj is indeed getting a part time rate he must have been red lined. I doubt if progression was waived -- if he was deemed a should-have-been-'98 in 2000 he was given credit for two years progression as a make-whole. I'm not exactly sure where it says that Article 40 work is paid at Article 40 rates rather than 22.3 rates when performed by a 22.3, but it must be in there somewhere because that's the case everywhere, so far as I've seen. Anyway, I suspect the key is that 22.3 jobs that include inside tasks and Article 40 work are not deemed to be "combination jobs" as a matter of the intent and understanding of the parties. And I think it's in our rider that the Union is the only party with standing to pursue a grievance. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
22.3 Pay rate question
Top