Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
22.3 Pay rate question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gandydancer" data-source="post: 419994" data-attributes="member: 9310"><p>In other words, you don't have the text of the arbitration (not lawsuit, btw) ruling. Under the '98-'02 contract UPS was obliged to create 2500 full time jobs in each year of the contract. It claimed it didn't have to because it didn't have the volume to create those jobs, but lost that claim in arbitration. UPS was forced to create 5000 ft jobs effective Aug 1, 2000 and was forced to make the individuals who bid into those jobs whole for the 40-hour weeks they hadn't worked, hence the retro pay was for the differential between what they actually worked in each week and 40 hours, resulting in the phenomenon you have twice described (and I have not contradicted) that the more you worked the less retro pay you got. But they were only obliged to created 2500 jobs in '98 and my understanding is only 2500 of the jobs created 8/1/2000 got 8/1/98 seniority and two years retro pay, while the less senior 2500 who got 22.3 jobs on 8/1/2000 got 8/1/99 seniority and one year's retro pay. You claim that's wrong, but can't point to any evidence, so maybe you're right that all 5000 goit '98 seniority and two year's retro pay...but it doesn't seem likely.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gandydancer, post: 419994, member: 9310"] In other words, you don't have the text of the arbitration (not lawsuit, btw) ruling. Under the '98-'02 contract UPS was obliged to create 2500 full time jobs in each year of the contract. It claimed it didn't have to because it didn't have the volume to create those jobs, but lost that claim in arbitration. UPS was forced to create 5000 ft jobs effective Aug 1, 2000 and was forced to make the individuals who bid into those jobs whole for the 40-hour weeks they hadn't worked, hence the retro pay was for the differential between what they actually worked in each week and 40 hours, resulting in the phenomenon you have twice described (and I have not contradicted) that the more you worked the less retro pay you got. But they were only obliged to created 2500 jobs in '98 and my understanding is only 2500 of the jobs created 8/1/2000 got 8/1/98 seniority and two years retro pay, while the less senior 2500 who got 22.3 jobs on 8/1/2000 got 8/1/99 seniority and one year's retro pay. You claim that's wrong, but can't point to any evidence, so maybe you're right that all 5000 goit '98 seniority and two year's retro pay...but it doesn't seem likely. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
22.3 Pay rate question
Top