39:4-67 Disqualifies me from driving?

[ringsaroundnj]

Was hoping for some feedback, guys.... I was supposed to start driving for my second casual season and I was told by the HR rep that I was not eligible because of a violation I received earlier this year. I'm confused between a non-moving violation and a no-points moving violation. Which do I have? There's very little correct info online.... Just opinions and people saying they hope they are offered that plea option.

39:4-67 - Obstructing passage of vehicles.

Does this in fact disqualify me from driving as a casual driver this season?

I vaguely recall the circumstances but I believe I took this plea to avoid going to trial. I was going to fight the ticket but it was worth it for me to pay $54 with no points or insurance surcharge instead of spending a day in court. If this trips me up and disqualifies me, I wonder if there's a way to go back to court and amend it to something else.

Please help, I'm very upset.
David

 

[Covemastah]

How can you vaguely forget that ticket ?? Exactly what did you do !! It will help the BC jury decide !!!

 

[ringsaroundnj]

How can you vaguely forget that ticket ?? Exactly what did you do !! It will help the BC jury decide !!!

Vaguely because I probably didn't think much of it at the time.

I got pulled over at 2am for cutting a left turn to soon and crossed the double yellow before it broke for the intersection. The lines were faded and I was simply pulled over in an attempt for the officer to find another issue, however, there was none. I had photo and video evidence and was prepared to fight it.

Is the BC jury going to give me a job or call HR with a not-guilty verdict?

 

[FrigidFTSup]

Yep. You're not going to get a casual position this year.

 

[burrheadd]

Vaguely because I probably didn't think much of it at the time.

I got pulled over at 2am for cutting a left turn to soon and crossed the double yellow before it broke for the intersection. The lines were faded and I was simply pulled over in an attempt for the officer to find another issue, however, there was none. I had photo and video evidence and was prepared to fight it.

Is the BC jury going to give me a job or call HR with a not-guilty verdict?

Were you high? A simple yes or no will do

 

[ringsaroundnj]

Yep. You're not going to get a casual position this year.

Exactly why? I know everyone has their own standards and rules but if New Jersey considers this a parking ticket, why doesn't UPS?

 

[Covemastah]

Agh man that sux !!! Maybe it won't show on the rmv report ,, but I would explain it to them in case it does! I think you'll be in the clear ,, Good luck
Expect some playful beat down on here and some good advice !! Don't take anything to heart !!

 

[FrigidFTSup]

Exactly why? I know everyone has their own standards and rules but it New Jersey considers this a parking ticket, why doesn't UPS?

That's not a parking ticket. You were moving were you not?

 

[ringsaroundnj]

Yeah, but very slowly. .

Playful banter is okay but when livelihoods are at stake, people should be more considerate.

 

[FrigidFTSup]

Playful banter is okay but when livelihoods are at stake, people should be more considerate.

Maybe people should be more considerate in their driving when their livelihood is at stake.

 

[ringsaroundnj]

Maybe people should be more considerate in their driving when their livelihood is at stake.

That's very true... Too bad for those idiots.

 

[Turdferguson]

That's very true... Too bad for those idiots.

UPS ? Or people who drive correctly?

 

[MyTripisCut]

UPS ? Or people who drive correctly?

I think he meant Kentuckians

 

[FrigidFTSup]

That's very true... Too bad for those idiots.

Look in the mirror and you'll find one of them.

 

[Turdferguson]

I think he meant Kentuckians

You sure it's not whatever you turds from Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York are called

 

[MendozaJ]

You pleaded guilty to a moving violation. The back of the ticket tells you what rights you are waiving when you sign it. You will find no good news here.

 

[TooTechie]

Actually the verbiage used in the charge could be used in two ways. It could reference someone double parked blocking a lane of travel or someone going under the posted minimum on a highway.

 

[scooby0048]

Deleted because I was not paying attention and apparently cannot read.

 

[barnyard]

Not a moving violation and no points on your record. Probably would not be on your MVD record just a local record in the city / township you were cited. I wouldn't worry about it unless it comes up.

It did come up, that is why the thread was started.

 

[scooby0048]

It did come up, that is why the thread was started.

You know, sometimes you just have to eat sht pie and admit that you were wrong. Good catch Barn, I totally missed that sentence.

Fixed it!