Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
9/11 Conspiracy Theories
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 871136" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>BABA,</p><p></p><p>ok, how about you explain (to the best you can, not looking for expert advice, just conversation) why there are no parts at the crash site? No wheels, no tail sections, no wings, no bodies, no luggage, no wires, no aluminum, no titanium, or seats from flight 93? Explain how this could happen at 400 mph and with fires ranging in the 1000 degree level.</p><p></p><p>Then compare that to the shuttle, traveling at 25 thousand miles an hour, in heat in excess of 10 THOUSAND degrees and almost all the parts recovered, including the bodies.</p><p></p><p>Explain why, for the first time in aviation history, two commercial passenger airliners crash, one into a building, and the other straight into the ground, and there are no parts?</p><p></p><p>Why in every other crash of a commercial jet liner, has there been wings, wheels, engine(s) bodies, luggage, wires, aluminum, titanium, bolts, screws and landing gears except for the 2 planes involved in 911?</p><p></p><p>How can this be possible? Why were these two planes exempt from science?</p><p></p><p><img src="http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/747_150.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> </p><p><img src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/09/04/article-1308970-0B09508A000005DC-260_964x626.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p><img src="http://www.iasa.com.au/folders/images/korphil.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p><img src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2006/07/koreancrashPA_228x147.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /><img src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2006/07/koreancrashPA_228x147.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p>Peace.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 871136, member: 17969"] BABA, ok, how about you explain (to the best you can, not looking for expert advice, just conversation) why there are no parts at the crash site? No wheels, no tail sections, no wings, no bodies, no luggage, no wires, no aluminum, no titanium, or seats from flight 93? Explain how this could happen at 400 mph and with fires ranging in the 1000 degree level. Then compare that to the shuttle, traveling at 25 thousand miles an hour, in heat in excess of 10 THOUSAND degrees and almost all the parts recovered, including the bodies. Explain why, for the first time in aviation history, two commercial passenger airliners crash, one into a building, and the other straight into the ground, and there are no parts? Why in every other crash of a commercial jet liner, has there been wings, wheels, engine(s) bodies, luggage, wires, aluminum, titanium, bolts, screws and landing gears except for the 2 planes involved in 911? How can this be possible? Why were these two planes exempt from science? [IMG]http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/747_150.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/09/04/article-1308970-0B09508A000005DC-260_964x626.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://www.iasa.com.au/folders/images/korphil.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2006/07/koreancrashPA_228x147.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2006/07/koreancrashPA_228x147.jpg[/IMG] Peace. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
9/11 Conspiracy Theories
Top