Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
9/11 Conspiracy Theories
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 871339" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>Ok, good question, NONE of them were, however, WTC 7 was built just like them but with BETTER construction then ALL of those skyscrapers in the photos. It was the latest in BOXED STEEL designs. It had bunkers inside of it. A command center that was able to withstand a bombing. Yet, with a couple of small fires, the entire structure comes down in FREEFALL speed.</p><p></p><p>Same with the trade towers. The real problem with the official story is that the towers also fell in FREEFALL speed, which means that as each floor fell, it had NO RESISTANCE. This would be virtually impossible given the set of circumstances on 911. The planes hit towards the top of each tower, yet there were explosions in the basement and lower floors. When the towers fell, every single column, brace, weld, bracket, screw, nut, bolt, on every floor in every corner of the towers would have had to simultaneously failed in order for the building to achieve FREE FALL SPEED. On 911, three buildings went down in FREE FALL speed, with WTC 7 being the most obvious hoax ever.</p><p></p><p>It is scientifically impossible for any building to fall in free fall speed without the asisstance of demolition charges.</p><p></p><p>As one floor impacts the next one, the speed of the building slows down. It has to slow down because upon impact, the floor below has to give way and fail, so , on the way down, things slow down. On 911, the lower floors gave way on every aspect of the construction of the towers simultaneously including the basement causing the buildings to fall at a rate of 1 floor per second.</p><p></p><p>This is impossible. Thats what makes it necessary to find out the truth.</p><p></p><p>Its all science. We have to eliminate the "heartstrings" and "emotions" and look at 911 with a clear mind. A rational mind without the prejudice of politics or potential outcomes.</p><p></p><p>The truther movement isnt out to convince anyone, they want you to convince yourselves. Just take out the political rhetoric or distractions of what you THINK you know, and apply common sense science to the evidence.</p><p></p><p>I believed the original story I was told, and I had no reason to question it. I started to hear about controversies in 2005 and watched a video called "loose change", it got my interest and I started listening to the many experts who were disecting the 911 events.</p><p></p><p>There are more questions than there are answers with 911, and to remember 911 only as a moment of silence for the victims, is to re-victimize those that died. The truth is out there, more people are begining to listen, learn and question.</p><p></p><p>19 hijackers didnt do all this damage alone. It was well financed, backed by goverments close to players in our own goverment, and by design, it was successful all the way up to selling the story to the american public who now reject any other explanations.</p><p></p><p>I know I kid you all on many threads, but this one I take seriously.</p><p></p><p>Heres a question? How did the BBC broadcasting network know that building WTC 7 was going to fall down, before it fell down? The reporter on LIVE AIR said the building went down, but in her LIVE SHOT, the building was still standing...?? BBC pulled the feed seconds after the mistake was made by the network?</p><p></p><p>Many legal attempts at preventing this video were filed by the BBC and failed.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAgi4Z5ImRU" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAgi4Z5ImRU</a></p><p> </p><p>Answer that one.</p><p></p><p>Peace.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 871339, member: 17969"] Ok, good question, NONE of them were, however, WTC 7 was built just like them but with BETTER construction then ALL of those skyscrapers in the photos. It was the latest in BOXED STEEL designs. It had bunkers inside of it. A command center that was able to withstand a bombing. Yet, with a couple of small fires, the entire structure comes down in FREEFALL speed. Same with the trade towers. The real problem with the official story is that the towers also fell in FREEFALL speed, which means that as each floor fell, it had NO RESISTANCE. This would be virtually impossible given the set of circumstances on 911. The planes hit towards the top of each tower, yet there were explosions in the basement and lower floors. When the towers fell, every single column, brace, weld, bracket, screw, nut, bolt, on every floor in every corner of the towers would have had to simultaneously failed in order for the building to achieve FREE FALL SPEED. On 911, three buildings went down in FREE FALL speed, with WTC 7 being the most obvious hoax ever. It is scientifically impossible for any building to fall in free fall speed without the asisstance of demolition charges. As one floor impacts the next one, the speed of the building slows down. It has to slow down because upon impact, the floor below has to give way and fail, so , on the way down, things slow down. On 911, the lower floors gave way on every aspect of the construction of the towers simultaneously including the basement causing the buildings to fall at a rate of 1 floor per second. This is impossible. Thats what makes it necessary to find out the truth. Its all science. We have to eliminate the "heartstrings" and "emotions" and look at 911 with a clear mind. A rational mind without the prejudice of politics or potential outcomes. The truther movement isnt out to convince anyone, they want you to convince yourselves. Just take out the political rhetoric or distractions of what you THINK you know, and apply common sense science to the evidence. I believed the original story I was told, and I had no reason to question it. I started to hear about controversies in 2005 and watched a video called "loose change", it got my interest and I started listening to the many experts who were disecting the 911 events. There are more questions than there are answers with 911, and to remember 911 only as a moment of silence for the victims, is to re-victimize those that died. The truth is out there, more people are begining to listen, learn and question. 19 hijackers didnt do all this damage alone. It was well financed, backed by goverments close to players in our own goverment, and by design, it was successful all the way up to selling the story to the american public who now reject any other explanations. I know I kid you all on many threads, but this one I take seriously. Heres a question? How did the BBC broadcasting network know that building WTC 7 was going to fall down, before it fell down? The reporter on LIVE AIR said the building went down, but in her LIVE SHOT, the building was still standing...?? BBC pulled the feed seconds after the mistake was made by the network? Many legal attempts at preventing this video were filed by the BBC and failed. [URL]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAgi4Z5ImRU[/URL] Answer that one. Peace. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
9/11 Conspiracy Theories
Top