Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
9/11 Conspiracy Theories
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="soberups" data-source="post: 871520" data-attributes="member: 14668"><p>OK, here's the deal;</p><p></p><p>Bush/Cheney was, without a doubt, the most corrupt and incompetent President that our nation has ever had. And I do not doubt for one minute that he intended to invade Iraq long before 9-11, and that he used 9-11 as an excuse.</p><p></p><p>That being said, the conspiracy theories simply <em>do not add up</em>.</p><p></p><p>If I am Bush/Cheney and I want to create some sort of "Pearl Harbor" event to justify military action that I had already decided upon ahead of time...there are much<em> simpler and easier </em>ways to do it than arranging for 4 airliners to get hijacked and turned into Kamakaze flights against buildings that I have had pre-wired with demolition charges.</p><p></p><p>A conspiracy of that magnitude is<em> too </em>complicated, it involves <em>too</em> many people, and there are <em>too</em> many loose ends, variables and potential points of failure.</p><p></p><p>If I am Bush/Cheney and I want to "justify" a war against Iraq under the pretense that WMD's are being produced there, I wouldnt hire a bunch of Saudi Arabians to hijack airliners with box cutters. Instead, I would "arrange" for a small, crude nuclear device to go off somewhere in the United States that could be blamed on Iraq. Such a device could be constructed and deployed by a mere handful of people, as opposed to the hundreds or even thousands that would have to be "in on" a conspiracy to destroy the Twin Towers using jet airliners and demolition charges.</p><p></p><p>I do believe that a conspiracy took place <strong><em>after the fact </em></strong>to cover up the potentially embarrassing failures of our intelligence apparatus to predict and stop the attack. And I have no doubt that there was a conspiracy <em><strong>after the fact </strong></em>to maximize the "potential" of the 9-11 attacks to <em>justify</em> the invasion of Iraq that had already been decided upon ahead of time.</p><p></p><p>But the idea that Bush/Cheney had any <em>direct, premeditated involvement </em>with the 9-11 attacks simply doesnt wash with me. I do not for one minute put it past Bush/Cheney to kill Americans in order to justify their little war, but it simply is not logical that they would choose to do so in the manner that the conspiracy theorists accuse them of.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="soberups, post: 871520, member: 14668"] OK, here's the deal; Bush/Cheney was, without a doubt, the most corrupt and incompetent President that our nation has ever had. And I do not doubt for one minute that he intended to invade Iraq long before 9-11, and that he used 9-11 as an excuse. That being said, the conspiracy theories simply [I]do not add up[/I]. If I am Bush/Cheney and I want to create some sort of "Pearl Harbor" event to justify military action that I had already decided upon ahead of time...there are much[I] simpler and easier [/I]ways to do it than arranging for 4 airliners to get hijacked and turned into Kamakaze flights against buildings that I have had pre-wired with demolition charges. A conspiracy of that magnitude is[I] too [/I]complicated, it involves [I]too[/I] many people, and there are [I]too[/I] many loose ends, variables and potential points of failure. If I am Bush/Cheney and I want to "justify" a war against Iraq under the pretense that WMD's are being produced there, I wouldnt hire a bunch of Saudi Arabians to hijack airliners with box cutters. Instead, I would "arrange" for a small, crude nuclear device to go off somewhere in the United States that could be blamed on Iraq. Such a device could be constructed and deployed by a mere handful of people, as opposed to the hundreds or even thousands that would have to be "in on" a conspiracy to destroy the Twin Towers using jet airliners and demolition charges. I do believe that a conspiracy took place [B][I]after the fact [/I][/B]to cover up the potentially embarrassing failures of our intelligence apparatus to predict and stop the attack. And I have no doubt that there was a conspiracy [I][B]after the fact [/B][/I]to maximize the "potential" of the 9-11 attacks to [I]justify[/I] the invasion of Iraq that had already been decided upon ahead of time. But the idea that Bush/Cheney had any [I]direct, premeditated involvement [/I]with the 9-11 attacks simply doesnt wash with me. I do not for one minute put it past Bush/Cheney to kill Americans in order to justify their little war, but it simply is not logical that they would choose to do so in the manner that the conspiracy theorists accuse them of. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
9/11 Conspiracy Theories
Top