Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
9/11 Conspiracy Theories
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="soberups" data-source="post: 871541" data-attributes="member: 14668"><p>I am in total agreement with you about the ability and willingess of our government to resort to "false flag" operations in order to mislead the public.</p><p></p><p>I <em>disagree</em> that 9-11 was a "false flag" operation.</p><p></p><p>9-11 was too widespread, too complicated, and it involved too many variables.</p><p></p><p>In order for a "false flag" operation to succeed and not be subsequently exposed, you need to keep it simple and you need to keep the number of people involved to a <em>bare minimum</em>. If in fact 9-11 was a "false flag" operation it would have required the involvement of many hundreds if not thousands of people.</p><p></p><p>It would have been a lot simpler, cheaper and easier to detonate a crude nuclear device on the outskirts of a medium-sized city and then blame it on "terrorists" (who would, of course, be conveniently vaporized in the blast) that were being "supported" by Iraq. If you are looking for justification for an invasion of Iraq, there it is on a silver platter.</p><p></p><p>A crude, gun-type uranium fission bomb (the kind that was dropped on Hiroshima) could <em>easily</em> be assembled by a mere handful of people in the back of a rental van. The actual <em>design</em> of such a bomb is quite simple; the only difficulty lies in obtaining sufficent quantitites of enriched, weapons-grade uranium. Once you have the uranium, the rest is easy. Such a plan would be<em> far simpler </em>than trying to coordinate the demolition of buildings with the simultaneous hijacking of airliners, and it would be far more effective for the purposes of justifying the invasion of Iraq.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="soberups, post: 871541, member: 14668"] I am in total agreement with you about the ability and willingess of our government to resort to "false flag" operations in order to mislead the public. I [I]disagree[/I] that 9-11 was a "false flag" operation. 9-11 was too widespread, too complicated, and it involved too many variables. In order for a "false flag" operation to succeed and not be subsequently exposed, you need to keep it simple and you need to keep the number of people involved to a [I]bare minimum[/I]. If in fact 9-11 was a "false flag" operation it would have required the involvement of many hundreds if not thousands of people. It would have been a lot simpler, cheaper and easier to detonate a crude nuclear device on the outskirts of a medium-sized city and then blame it on "terrorists" (who would, of course, be conveniently vaporized in the blast) that were being "supported" by Iraq. If you are looking for justification for an invasion of Iraq, there it is on a silver platter. A crude, gun-type uranium fission bomb (the kind that was dropped on Hiroshima) could [I]easily[/I] be assembled by a mere handful of people in the back of a rental van. The actual [I]design[/I] of such a bomb is quite simple; the only difficulty lies in obtaining sufficent quantitites of enriched, weapons-grade uranium. Once you have the uranium, the rest is easy. Such a plan would be[I] far simpler [/I]than trying to coordinate the demolition of buildings with the simultaneous hijacking of airliners, and it would be far more effective for the purposes of justifying the invasion of Iraq. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
9/11 Conspiracy Theories
Top