Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
9/11 conspirators
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)" data-source="post: 641143" data-attributes="member: 12570"><p>The term you are describing is <strong>disclosure. </strong>The defense is entitled to full disclosure--anything less can be grounds for mistrial--but do we really want all of that sensitive information disclosed to these people? What would happen if we did provide full disclosure and the case still ended up in a mistrial or, even worse, they are acquitted? Do we then ask them not to reveal any of this information <strong>in the interest of national security</strong>?</p><p> </p><p>This case should be tried in a military court.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="UpstateNYUPSer(Ret), post: 641143, member: 12570"] The term you are describing is [B]disclosure. [/B]The defense is entitled to full disclosure--anything less can be grounds for mistrial--but do we really want all of that sensitive information disclosed to these people? What would happen if we did provide full disclosure and the case still ended up in a mistrial or, even worse, they are acquitted? Do we then ask them not to reveal any of this information [B]in the interest of national security[/B]? This case should be tried in a military court. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
9/11 conspirators
Top