Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
A sincere warning to all current and prospective contractors.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dmac1" data-source="post: 3908594" data-attributes="member: 60252"><p>Did you read the link?????? The NLRB ruled them to be co-employers, and they setteld rather than go through an appeals process. Since it did not get ruled on in the justice system, it did not set a legal precedent, but if the NLRB is presented another case with similar facts, the NLRB would likely rule the same way.</p><p></p><p>An example- I was found to be a fedex employee by a state agency under their rules, and Fedex dropped their appeal of the ruling and settled with the agency/paid the tax in order to avoid a COURT ruling that likely would have gone the same way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dmac1, post: 3908594, member: 60252"] Did you read the link?????? The NLRB ruled them to be co-employers, and they setteld rather than go through an appeals process. Since it did not get ruled on in the justice system, it did not set a legal precedent, but if the NLRB is presented another case with similar facts, the NLRB would likely rule the same way. An example- I was found to be a fedex employee by a state agency under their rules, and Fedex dropped their appeal of the ruling and settled with the agency/paid the tax in order to avoid a COURT ruling that likely would have gone the same way. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
A sincere warning to all current and prospective contractors.
Top