Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Abortion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="trplnkl" data-source="post: 927607" data-attributes="member: 13254"><p><span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong> Rape or incest are two possible situations where I might vary from my anti-abortion stance. I still can't be in favor of those abortions but I can't blame them because the woman is usually an unwilling participant.</strong></em></span> </p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong> How do you come to the conclusion of when life begins?</strong></em></span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong>Dave you are contradicting yourself in two posts, in one you contradict yourself in the same sentence. When you are saying a woman shouldn't be forced to carry an unwanted child to term IS a form of birth control for convenience. Doesn't matter how one looks at abortion, it is a form of birth control. The only thing that varies is the reason. </strong></em></span></p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong> Who do you think are adopting the unwanted new born babies? I would be willing to bet few of them come from the pro-abortion camp. </strong></em></span></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong>The adoption agencies are in place to TRY and insure that people adopting children are not monsters that do horrible things to children. </strong></em></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong></strong></em></span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong> I think BOTH are a responsibility of the individuals that created them. I was concerned over the killing of unborn children long before I knew there we republicans and democrats. </strong></em></span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong></strong></em></span></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong>That doesn't stop the fact that the female has already made the choice to have unprotected sex, full well knowing that she may get pregnant. </strong></em></span></p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong> The freedom of choice was when the heavy breathing was going on. </strong></em></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong></strong></em></span></p><p></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong>That is the problem with social liberals that want everyone to act anyway they want with no responsibility for their actions. I say if you make a mistake Human Up and that care of their responsibilities. As I asked Cach, who do you think are adopting the unwanted babies? Probably social conservatives. </strong></em></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong></strong></em></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong></strong></em></span></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong>Where do you get that twisted logic? What social law, is that a canadian thing? There shouldn't be a child allowance anyway. </strong></em></span></p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong> Your are absolutely correct this should be a shared responsibility and it both parties should be involved with the birth and support equally. It's too easy to prove who the sperm donor is not to force...YES FORCE.. the man to support their child. Any male that refuses to do so has no right to call themselves a man. Again, adoption of a wonderful thing. </strong></em></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong></strong></em></span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong> Klein, that was uncalled for and out of line. You owe Moreluck apology. </strong></em></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="trplnkl, post: 927607, member: 13254"] [FONT=comic sans ms][I][B] Rape or incest are two possible situations where I might vary from my anti-abortion stance. I still can't be in favor of those abortions but I can't blame them because the woman is usually an unwilling participant.[/B][/I][/FONT] [FONT=comic sans ms][I][B] How do you come to the conclusion of when life begins?[/B][/I][/FONT] [FONT=comic sans ms][I][B]Dave you are contradicting yourself in two posts, in one you contradict yourself in the same sentence. When you are saying a woman shouldn't be forced to carry an unwanted child to term IS a form of birth control for convenience. Doesn't matter how one looks at abortion, it is a form of birth control. The only thing that varies is the reason. [/B][/I][/FONT] [FONT=comic sans ms][I][B] Who do you think are adopting the unwanted new born babies? I would be willing to bet few of them come from the pro-abortion camp. The adoption agencies are in place to TRY and insure that people adopting children are not monsters that do horrible things to children. [/B][/I][/FONT] [FONT=comic sans ms][I][B] I think BOTH are a responsibility of the individuals that created them. I was concerned over the killing of unborn children long before I knew there we republicans and democrats. [/B][/I][/FONT] [FONT=comic sans ms][I][B] That doesn't stop the fact that the female has already made the choice to have unprotected sex, full well knowing that she may get pregnant. [/B][/I][/FONT] [FONT=comic sans ms][I][B] The freedom of choice was when the heavy breathing was going on. [/B][/I][/FONT] [FONT=comic sans ms][I][B]That is the problem with social liberals that want everyone to act anyway they want with no responsibility for their actions. I say if you make a mistake Human Up and that care of their responsibilities. As I asked Cach, who do you think are adopting the unwanted babies? Probably social conservatives. [/B][/I][/FONT] [FONT=comic sans ms][I][B] Where do you get that twisted logic? What social law, is that a canadian thing? There shouldn't be a child allowance anyway. [/B][/I][/FONT] [FONT=comic sans ms][I][B] Your are absolutely correct this should be a shared responsibility and it both parties should be involved with the birth and support equally. It's too easy to prove who the sperm donor is not to force...YES FORCE.. the man to support their child. Any male that refuses to do so has no right to call themselves a man. Again, adoption of a wonderful thing. [/B][/I][/FONT] [FONT=comic sans ms][I][B] Klein, that was uncalled for and out of line. You owe Moreluck apology. [/B][/I][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Abortion
Top