Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Act Section 806
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ashell" data-source="post: 560884" data-attributes="member: 23726"><p>"Select" co-workers of mine were asked to fill out letters like you are talking about. I was curious as to what section 806 actually said since often UPS flat out lies to us. Here it is:</p><p> </p><p>(a) In General- Section 201 of the Railway Labor Act (<a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/usc-cgi/newurl?type=titlesect&title=45&section=181" target="_blank"><u><span style="color: #0000ff">45 U.S.C. 181</span></u></a>) is amended--</p><p><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/embed/sample-billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2054" target="_blank">http://www.govtrack.us/embed/sample-billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0:rfs:2054</a><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2054" target="_blank">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0:rfs:2054</a></p><p>(1) by striking ‘All’ and inserting ‘(a) In General- All’;</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/embed/sample-billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2055" target="_blank">http://www.govtrack.us/embed/sample-billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0:rfs:2055</a><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2055" target="_blank">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0:rfs:2055</a></p><p>(2) by inserting ‘and every express carrier’ after ‘common carrier by air’; and</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/embed/sample-billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2056" target="_blank">http://www.govtrack.us/embed/sample-billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0:rfs:2056</a><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2056" target="_blank">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0:rfs:2056</a></p><p>(3) by adding at the end the following:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/embed/sample-billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2057" target="_blank">http://www.govtrack.us/embed/sample-billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0:rfs:2057</a><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2057" target="_blank">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0:rfs:2057</a></p><p>‘(b) Special Rules for Express Carriers-</p><p><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/embed/sample-billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2058" target="_blank">http://www.govtrack.us/embed/sample-billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0:rfs:2058</a><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2058" target="_blank">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0:rfs:2058</a></p><p>‘(1) IN GENERAL- An employee of an express carrier shall be covered by this Act only if that employee is in a position that is eligible for certification under part 61, 63, or 65 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, and only if that employee performs duties for the express carrier that are eligible for such certification. All other employees of an express carrier shall be covered by the provisions of the National Labor Relations Act (<a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/usc-cgi/newurl?type=titlesect&title=29&section=151" target="_blank"><u><span style="color: #0000ff">29 U.S.C. 151</span></u></a> et seq.).</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/embed/sample-billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2059" target="_blank">http://www.govtrack.us/embed/sample-billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0:rfs:2059</a><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2059" target="_blank">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0:rfs:2059</a></p><p>‘(2) AIR CARRIER STATUS- Any person that is an express carrier shall be governed by paragraph (1) notwithstanding any finding that the person is also a common carrier by air.</p><p></p><p></p><p>‘(3) EXPRESS CARRIER DEFINED- In this section, the term ‘express carrier’ means any person (or persons affiliated through common control or ownership) whose primary business is the express shipment of freight or packages through an integrated network of air and surface transportation.’.</p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/embed/sample-billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2061" target="_blank">http://www.govtrack.us/embed/sample-billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0:rfs:2061</a><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2061" target="_blank">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0:rfs:2061</a></p><p>(b) Conforming Amendment- Section 1 of such Act (<a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/usc-cgi/newurl?type=titlesect&title=45&section=151" target="_blank"><u><span style="color: #0000ff">45 U.S.C. 151</span></u></a>) is amended in the first paragraph by striking ‘, any express company that would have been subject to subtitle IV of title 49, United States Code, as of December 31, 1995,’.</p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915" target="_blank">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915</a></p><p> </p><p>I agree with the other people that have said, UPS needs to clean up their act instead of crying about how things are unfair. I have no sympathy for UPS. I don't really understand how this unfairly gives FedEX an advantage. Maybe someone else that knows legalees can explain it.</p><p> </p><p>I would also like to know, what is this 3.5 hours rule? Does that apply to air hubs? Its nice to know that managers shave time at other hubs too. I thought it was just my hub that was shady. If you have to steal from your own employees, maybe you are doing something wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ashell, post: 560884, member: 23726"] "Select" co-workers of mine were asked to fill out letters like you are talking about. I was curious as to what section 806 actually said since often UPS flat out lies to us. Here it is: (a) In General- Section 201 of the Railway Labor Act ([URL="http://www.law.cornell.edu/usc-cgi/newurl?type=titlesect&title=45§ion=181"][U][COLOR=#0000ff]45 U.S.C. 181[/COLOR][/U][/URL]) is amended-- [URL="http://www.govtrack.us/embed/sample-billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2054"][/URL][URL="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2054"][/URL] (1) by striking ‘All’ and inserting ‘(a) In General- All’; [URL="http://www.govtrack.us/embed/sample-billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2055"][/URL][URL="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2055"][/URL] (2) by inserting ‘and every express carrier’ after ‘common carrier by air’; and [URL="http://www.govtrack.us/embed/sample-billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2056"][/URL][URL="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2056"][/URL] (3) by adding at the end the following: [URL="http://www.govtrack.us/embed/sample-billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2057"][/URL][URL="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2057"][/URL] ‘(b) Special Rules for Express Carriers- [URL="http://www.govtrack.us/embed/sample-billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2058"][/URL][URL="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2058"][/URL] ‘(1) IN GENERAL- An employee of an express carrier shall be covered by this Act only if that employee is in a position that is eligible for certification under part 61, 63, or 65 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, and only if that employee performs duties for the express carrier that are eligible for such certification. All other employees of an express carrier shall be covered by the provisions of the National Labor Relations Act ([URL="http://www.law.cornell.edu/usc-cgi/newurl?type=titlesect&title=29§ion=151"][U][COLOR=#0000ff]29 U.S.C. 151[/COLOR][/U][/URL] et seq.). [URL="http://www.govtrack.us/embed/sample-billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2059"][/URL][URL="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2059"][/URL] ‘(2) AIR CARRIER STATUS- Any person that is an express carrier shall be governed by paragraph (1) notwithstanding any finding that the person is also a common carrier by air. ‘(3) EXPRESS CARRIER DEFINED- In this section, the term ‘express carrier’ means any person (or persons affiliated through common control or ownership) whose primary business is the express shipment of freight or packages through an integrated network of air and surface transportation.’. [URL="http://www.govtrack.us/embed/sample-billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2061"][/URL][URL="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915&version=rfs&nid=t0%3Arfs%3A2061"][/URL] (b) Conforming Amendment- Section 1 of such Act ([URL="http://www.law.cornell.edu/usc-cgi/newurl?type=titlesect&title=45§ion=151"][U][COLOR=#0000ff]45 U.S.C. 151[/COLOR][/U][/URL]) is amended in the first paragraph by striking ‘, any express company that would have been subject to subtitle IV of title 49, United States Code, as of December 31, 1995,’. [URL]http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-915[/URL] I agree with the other people that have said, UPS needs to clean up their act instead of crying about how things are unfair. I have no sympathy for UPS. I don't really understand how this unfairly gives FedEX an advantage. Maybe someone else that knows legalees can explain it. I would also like to know, what is this 3.5 hours rule? Does that apply to air hubs? Its nice to know that managers shave time at other hubs too. I thought it was just my hub that was shady. If you have to steal from your own employees, maybe you are doing something wrong. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Act Section 806
Top