Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Affirmative Action Struck Down By SCOTUS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Box Ox" data-source="post: 5630187" data-attributes="member: 48469"><p>This is probably what he's talking about. Thomas wants to revisit 14th amendment due process cases but didn't include Loving v Virginia in his concurring opinion wish list last year.</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.businessinsider.com/obergefell-telling-clarence-thomas-didnt-bring-up-loving-v-virginia-2022-6[/URL]</p><p></p><p>"In a <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/justice-thomas-said-the-court-should-reconsider-rulings-on-same-sex-marriage-2022-6" target="_blank">concurring opinion</a> following the ruling, Thomas wrote that "we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell."</p><p></p><p>These cases protect the right to <a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/1964/496" target="_blank">contraceptive access</a>, <a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/2002/02-102" target="_blank">same-sex relationships</a>, and <a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/2014/14-556" target="_blank">same-sex marriage</a>, respectively.</p><p></p><p>Loving v. Virginia, which <a href="https://www.insider.com/roe-wade-loving-virginia-interracial-marriage-scotus-overturns-2022-6" target="_blank">protects the right to interracial marriage</a> and also concerns the due process clause of the 14th amendment, was not a part of Thomas' list."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Box Ox, post: 5630187, member: 48469"] This is probably what he's talking about. Thomas wants to revisit 14th amendment due process cases but didn't include Loving v Virginia in his concurring opinion wish list last year. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.businessinsider.com/obergefell-telling-clarence-thomas-didnt-bring-up-loving-v-virginia-2022-6[/URL] "In a [URL='https://www.businessinsider.com/justice-thomas-said-the-court-should-reconsider-rulings-on-same-sex-marriage-2022-6']concurring opinion[/URL] following the ruling, Thomas wrote that "we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell." These cases protect the right to [URL='https://www.oyez.org/cases/1964/496']contraceptive access[/URL], [URL='https://www.oyez.org/cases/2002/02-102']same-sex relationships[/URL], and [URL='https://www.oyez.org/cases/2014/14-556']same-sex marriage[/URL], respectively. Loving v. Virginia, which [URL='https://www.insider.com/roe-wade-loving-virginia-interracial-marriage-scotus-overturns-2022-6']protects the right to interracial marriage[/URL] and also concerns the due process clause of the 14th amendment, was not a part of Thomas' list." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Affirmative Action Struck Down By SCOTUS
Top