Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
An accident is now a "crash."
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Integrity" data-source="post: 809737" data-attributes="member: 26800"><p>under the radar,</p><p> </p><p>I think it is probably a good thing.</p><p> </p><p>The term accident probably lures the driver involved into a good faith discussion as to how the accident might be able to have been prevented or prevented in the future.</p><p> </p><p>If done in good faith, this shouldn't be a problem, but it often is not done in good faith and is a problem.</p><p> </p><p>The result of this is usually an accident being considered avoidable when it should not have been.</p><p> </p><p>The avoidable term implies and is generally accepted as meaning "at fault".</p><p> </p><p>This is wrong.</p><p> </p><p>The term crash should not lure anyone involved in the crash into any discussion. When it is called a crash the only thing important is who is at fault.</p><p> </p><p>"At fault" should be determined by the police officer investigating the "crash". Not a biased party like the employer of a professional driver involved.</p><p> </p><p>Sincerely,</p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 22px">I</span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Integrity, post: 809737, member: 26800"] under the radar, I think it is probably a good thing. The term accident probably lures the driver involved into a good faith discussion as to how the accident might be able to have been prevented or prevented in the future. If done in good faith, this shouldn't be a problem, but it often is not done in good faith and is a problem. The result of this is usually an accident being considered avoidable when it should not have been. The avoidable term implies and is generally accepted as meaning "at fault". This is wrong. The term crash should not lure anyone involved in the crash into any discussion. When it is called a crash the only thing important is who is at fault. "At fault" should be determined by the police officer investigating the "crash". Not a biased party like the employer of a professional driver involved. Sincerely, [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=6]I[/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
An accident is now a "crash."
Top