Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Anthony Case
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="trplnkl" data-source="post: 856480" data-attributes="member: 13254"><p><span style="color: #8b4513"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong> See, that's the broken part of our system. The defense doesn't have to prove their statements to be true and valid. They shouldn't be allowed to make claims that can't be backed up. Saying the milkman could have done it should have to be backed up that the milkman actually could have. In the Anthony case, the "Nanny Zanny" didn't even know the Anthonys and nothing was shown where she even had access to the child, the family home or anything to do with the case. The defense (or the accused) could say "someone else" did it because I didn't. That doesn't point the finger at a specific person with zero proof. IMO, doing that should put the defense in the same boat as the prosecution, prove your accusations. The jury is supposed to make a decision based on the evidence, a wild ass claim is not evidence.</strong></em></span></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="trplnkl, post: 856480, member: 13254"] [COLOR=#8b4513][SIZE=3][FONT=comic sans ms][I][B] See, that's the broken part of our system. The defense doesn't have to prove their statements to be true and valid. They shouldn't be allowed to make claims that can't be backed up. Saying the milkman could have done it should have to be backed up that the milkman actually could have. In the Anthony case, the "Nanny Zanny" didn't even know the Anthonys and nothing was shown where she even had access to the child, the family home or anything to do with the case. The defense (or the accused) could say "someone else" did it because I didn't. That doesn't point the finger at a specific person with zero proof. IMO, doing that should put the defense in the same boat as the prosecution, prove your accusations. The jury is supposed to make a decision based on the evidence, a wild ass claim is not evidence.[/B][/I][/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Anthony Case
Top