Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Anthony Case
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 856599" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>SOBER,</p><p></p><p>Presumtion of innocense does not mean the defense can throw out claims that CANT BE REFUTED. How would you suggest the prosecution REFUTE the claim that George Anthony placed his penis into the mouth of Casey anthony before she went to school?</p><p></p><p>How does the prosecution REFUTE this without the satisfaction of placing Casey Anthony on the stand? She would be the only other person involved in the charge that could prove or disprove the claim. The prosecution has NO WAY to place Casey on the stand, so a major disadvantage develops.</p><p></p><p>A presumption of innocence means only that the defendant has a right to say nothing or prove nothing. But what it doesnt mean, is that the defense can throw out stories that will TAINT the jurys minds long before it hears the case and then use innuendo during the trial to further the claim.</p><p></p><p>You say the prosecution has every opportunity, but the facts prove the prosecution has NO OPPORTUNITY. What if the defense suggested that little green men from mars landed in florida, took caylee, did experiments, placed her in the pool and she drowned, then the martians tossed caylee into the swamp before boarding their space craft and flying back to mars.</p><p></p><p>How would you suggest the prosecution REFUTED this?</p><p></p><p>Peace.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 856599, member: 17969"] SOBER, Presumtion of innocense does not mean the defense can throw out claims that CANT BE REFUTED. How would you suggest the prosecution REFUTE the claim that George Anthony placed his penis into the mouth of Casey anthony before she went to school? How does the prosecution REFUTE this without the satisfaction of placing Casey Anthony on the stand? She would be the only other person involved in the charge that could prove or disprove the claim. The prosecution has NO WAY to place Casey on the stand, so a major disadvantage develops. A presumption of innocence means only that the defendant has a right to say nothing or prove nothing. But what it doesnt mean, is that the defense can throw out stories that will TAINT the jurys minds long before it hears the case and then use innuendo during the trial to further the claim. You say the prosecution has every opportunity, but the facts prove the prosecution has NO OPPORTUNITY. What if the defense suggested that little green men from mars landed in florida, took caylee, did experiments, placed her in the pool and she drowned, then the martians tossed caylee into the swamp before boarding their space craft and flying back to mars. How would you suggest the prosecution REFUTED this? Peace. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Anthony Case
Top