Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Anthony Case
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 856919" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>I believe that both sides should be required to submit their opening statements into the record prior to presenting them. The judge should review both, and render a decision based upon the facts of the case that are to be presented.</p><p></p><p>If the defense position is that they want to make a statement during opening but dont plan on presenting evidence to back it up, then it should be disallowed.</p><p></p><p>Confusing a jury is not a search for the truth.</p><p></p><p>What I wonder is why, if the defense knew the manner of death, the date of death and who was involved, WHY didnt they notify the police, the court or the prosecution? When did they know the "FACTS" of the case? </p><p></p><p>Did Casey Anthony admit to them the "TRUTH" back in July 2008? IF so, why did the defense let the child lay in the swamp to be eaten by animals until december? Why didnt the defense contact the police in July 2008 and simply tell them it was an accident and the body could be found in the swamp where it could have been recovered and given a proper burial? Why not notify the police of the conspiracy between George Anthony and Casey and change the direction of the investigation?</p><p></p><p>Does anyone see any logic to this reasoning? IF you do, then you have to reject the defense case and convict Casey Anthony.</p><p></p><p>Peace.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 856919, member: 17969"] I believe that both sides should be required to submit their opening statements into the record prior to presenting them. The judge should review both, and render a decision based upon the facts of the case that are to be presented. If the defense position is that they want to make a statement during opening but dont plan on presenting evidence to back it up, then it should be disallowed. Confusing a jury is not a search for the truth. What I wonder is why, if the defense knew the manner of death, the date of death and who was involved, WHY didnt they notify the police, the court or the prosecution? When did they know the "FACTS" of the case? Did Casey Anthony admit to them the "TRUTH" back in July 2008? IF so, why did the defense let the child lay in the swamp to be eaten by animals until december? Why didnt the defense contact the police in July 2008 and simply tell them it was an accident and the body could be found in the swamp where it could have been recovered and given a proper burial? Why not notify the police of the conspiracy between George Anthony and Casey and change the direction of the investigation? Does anyone see any logic to this reasoning? IF you do, then you have to reject the defense case and convict Casey Anthony. Peace. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Anthony Case
Top