Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Anti War Protests
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="canon" data-source="post: 168616" data-attributes="member: 8423"><p>Look, not sure if you noticed, <em>but we are still an occupying power</em>. We are still bound by international laws in that respect. And posting the geneva convention does you no good if you can't understand it. How about from Amnesty International since you didn't like Human Rights Watch (do you see a pattern here, these are organizations directly associated with international law).</p><p> Source: <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20080905040113/http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGMDE140892003" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20080905040113/http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGMDE140892003</a> tells you everything you need to know along with citations from where each is derived.</p><p></p><p></p><p> Source: <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20110107234612/http://www.asil.org/insights/insigh102.htm" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20110107234612/http://www.asil.org/insights/insigh102.htm</a> Big article. Good stuff.</p><p></p><p>This relates to the italic in the above post: Source: <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/06/03/1086203557559.html" target="_blank">http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/06/03/1086203557559.html</a></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you want me to provide a copy/paste definition of "restore" I can. But the short version is that we must return Iraq to the point where it can resonably defend itself and protect the citizens.</p><p></p><p> They can't adequately and efficienly administer anything if they can't even defend themselves. If you look at what we're doing there: Establishing an elected govt and training their military. Sounds to me like we're following international law</p><p>Source: <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20101214124251/http://crimesofwar.org/special/Iraq/news-iraq5.html" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20101214124251/http://crimesofwar.org/special/Iraq/news-iraq5.html</a></p><p></p><p></p><p>You're only hurting your own image by refuting what is so widely known. International law <strong>dictates</strong> we must return Iraq to the ability of being able to take care of the citizens. We wiped out their means of defending against attack, it is our responsibility to fix it.</p><p></p><p>If you need further reading, try here: <a href="http://www.google.com/" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="canon, post: 168616, member: 8423"] Look, not sure if you noticed, [I]but we are still an occupying power[/I]. We are still bound by international laws in that respect. And posting the geneva convention does you no good if you can't understand it. How about from Amnesty International since you didn't like Human Rights Watch (do you see a pattern here, these are organizations directly associated with international law). Source: [url]https://web.archive.org/web/20080905040113/http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGMDE140892003[/url] tells you everything you need to know along with citations from where each is derived. Source: [url]https://web.archive.org/web/20110107234612/http://www.asil.org/insights/insigh102.htm[/url] Big article. Good stuff. This relates to the italic in the above post: Source: [url]http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/06/03/1086203557559.html[/url] If you want me to provide a copy/paste definition of "restore" I can. But the short version is that we must return Iraq to the point where it can resonably defend itself and protect the citizens. They can't adequately and efficienly administer anything if they can't even defend themselves. If you look at what we're doing there: Establishing an elected govt and training their military. Sounds to me like we're following international law Source: [url]https://web.archive.org/web/20101214124251/http://crimesofwar.org/special/Iraq/news-iraq5.html[/url] You're only hurting your own image by refuting what is so widely known. International law [B]dictates[/B] we must return Iraq to the ability of being able to take care of the citizens. We wiped out their means of defending against attack, it is our responsibility to fix it. If you need further reading, try here: [url]http://www.google.com/[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Anti War Protests
Top