Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Any other feeder drivers working in the hub?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="trickpony1" data-source="post: 503881" data-attributes="member: 1957"><p>I have serious concerns with the case as quoted above:</p><p>1) was the BA present?</p><p>2) NEVER resign. If you do you have absolutely no hope. At least there is a chance at panel. I know of one case where the FD had an "off the clock" termination and was offered to resign. He immediately called the BA and was told not to resign or sign anything. He got his job back. I don't think there was back pay. He worked long enough to get covered by the new 6 billion dollar pension "early" contract and THEN handed in his resignation letter.</p><p>3) whatever happened to the language in the contract that talks about, "....the age and physical condition of the employee shall be taken into consideration."? I could be wrong but I think that language is still in the contract.</p><p>4) why did the feeder manager feel the need to muddy the waters with another separate and unrelated charge? If the company fired evryone who was ever dishonest then a large % of the ties, suits and pants suits would be walked out the gate. The BA should have separated the two charges and addressed the timeliness of the dishonesty charge.</p><p></p><p>This case has a very strong appearance of a "witch hunt".</p><p>This case also bolsters some posters contentions that the company will slowly start getting rid of the older employees so as to replace them with young runners and gunners making 40% less per hour and only one week vacation. "Witch hunts" have a strange way of getting twisted around in the company's favor. Been there, done that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="trickpony1, post: 503881, member: 1957"] I have serious concerns with the case as quoted above: 1) was the BA present? 2) NEVER resign. If you do you have absolutely no hope. At least there is a chance at panel. I know of one case where the FD had an "off the clock" termination and was offered to resign. He immediately called the BA and was told not to resign or sign anything. He got his job back. I don't think there was back pay. He worked long enough to get covered by the new 6 billion dollar pension "early" contract and THEN handed in his resignation letter. 3) whatever happened to the language in the contract that talks about, "....the age and physical condition of the employee shall be taken into consideration."? I could be wrong but I think that language is still in the contract. 4) why did the feeder manager feel the need to muddy the waters with another separate and unrelated charge? If the company fired evryone who was ever dishonest then a large % of the ties, suits and pants suits would be walked out the gate. The BA should have separated the two charges and addressed the timeliness of the dishonesty charge. This case has a very strong appearance of a "witch hunt". This case also bolsters some posters contentions that the company will slowly start getting rid of the older employees so as to replace them with young runners and gunners making 40% less per hour and only one week vacation. "Witch hunts" have a strange way of getting twisted around in the company's favor. Been there, done that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Any other feeder drivers working in the hub?
Top