Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Any PTSups notice a shortage in this weeks' paycheck?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="UPS Lifer" data-source="post: 662881" data-attributes="member: 9789"><p>Do you work in California? Are you familiar with California law. I am not commenting about the rest of the country in my post. </p><p></p><p>I didn't say that the holiday was automatically populated. I said the system was corrected. The FT supervisor has to approve the holiday. No approval - no hours populate which screws up the OT. Now I may have mis-stated the rate (2.0) about the double time for a 6th day... it might only be time-and-a-half. But the 6th day worked with no holiday was paid at one of those rates (2.0 or 1.5). Again the FT supervisor who approves the PTRS has to manually approve the 6th day or it won't be paid. There was a form that had to be filled out as well and sent in to payroll. </p><p></p><p>With the California lawsuit - I highly doubt the Pacific region would change this process. They would run the risk of another lawsuit. You change this system to benefit the company and bingo another class action will be filed. A precedent was set and unless the company changes it for the benefit of the PT supervisor, I am sure that UPS will not risk that. The only way it would revert back is if the company won an appeal which stated the PT supervisors were salaried. If that was the case then this thread would not be necessary because the PT supervisor would not be entitled to OT. </p><p></p><p>One person who might be able to give more insight into the California PTRS would be Hoke. He may have contacts who know what the current procedures are.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="UPS Lifer, post: 662881, member: 9789"] Do you work in California? Are you familiar with California law. I am not commenting about the rest of the country in my post. I didn't say that the holiday was automatically populated. I said the system was corrected. The FT supervisor has to approve the holiday. No approval - no hours populate which screws up the OT. Now I may have mis-stated the rate (2.0) about the double time for a 6th day... it might only be time-and-a-half. But the 6th day worked with no holiday was paid at one of those rates (2.0 or 1.5). Again the FT supervisor who approves the PTRS has to manually approve the 6th day or it won't be paid. There was a form that had to be filled out as well and sent in to payroll. With the California lawsuit - I highly doubt the Pacific region would change this process. They would run the risk of another lawsuit. You change this system to benefit the company and bingo another class action will be filed. A precedent was set and unless the company changes it for the benefit of the PT supervisor, I am sure that UPS will not risk that. The only way it would revert back is if the company won an appeal which stated the PT supervisors were salaried. If that was the case then this thread would not be necessary because the PT supervisor would not be entitled to OT. One person who might be able to give more insight into the California PTRS would be Hoke. He may have contacts who know what the current procedures are. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Any PTSups notice a shortage in this weeks' paycheck?
Top