Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
Anyone know what to expect regarding mgmt raises?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="beentheredonethat" data-source="post: 720657" data-attributes="member: 4886"><p>Although I'll agree that there are exceptions out there. I think of the QPR fitting into a bell curve like the time study guidelines. It's right roughly 95% of the time for 95% of the routes etc. Does it work for every mgmt group? No.. you could have one group where everyone is a stellar employee, and another group where everyone is not a good employee. But I think for the majority, each group does represent a bell curve or something similar to one. The bigger the group the more accurate the bell curve idea is. if you are talking about one ctr with 4 FT supvs then that's a little tough to say one is real good, two are avg, and one is below. But if you take it to a div mgr pkg group with closer to 30 FT supvs then that is a bit more fair. When I had people working for me and I was in charge of their raises (non mgmt hourlies - this was about 6 years ago). I gave raises based on an allotment my mgr gave me. I was given x dollars\hr for raises and I divied it up. (I had to take into acct midpoints etc). But a lot was I gave very little to my poor performers and a decent amount to my good performers. So it's not something totally new. But not all mgmt people did it before. Now it's practically forced on our bosses. Some did a good job and gave our raises based on our job skills, our merit, our success aka our qpr scores. Others were pretty much 2.5% across the board. Since I try hard, study and keep my knowledge base ahead of others. I was in the high performace group and got a 3.5% raise. Not huge.. but compared to today's standards it was a very good raise. I didn't ask others in my dept. But knowing I got 3.5, I knew others had to get less. So the folks who said I know for a fact they didn't give raises based on the qpr scales and we all got 2.5%, that was due to your mgmt team and I think they did a poor job based on your statements.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="beentheredonethat, post: 720657, member: 4886"] Although I'll agree that there are exceptions out there. I think of the QPR fitting into a bell curve like the time study guidelines. It's right roughly 95% of the time for 95% of the routes etc. Does it work for every mgmt group? No.. you could have one group where everyone is a stellar employee, and another group where everyone is not a good employee. But I think for the majority, each group does represent a bell curve or something similar to one. The bigger the group the more accurate the bell curve idea is. if you are talking about one ctr with 4 FT supvs then that's a little tough to say one is real good, two are avg, and one is below. But if you take it to a div mgr pkg group with closer to 30 FT supvs then that is a bit more fair. When I had people working for me and I was in charge of their raises (non mgmt hourlies - this was about 6 years ago). I gave raises based on an allotment my mgr gave me. I was given x dollars\hr for raises and I divied it up. (I had to take into acct midpoints etc). But a lot was I gave very little to my poor performers and a decent amount to my good performers. So it's not something totally new. But not all mgmt people did it before. Now it's practically forced on our bosses. Some did a good job and gave our raises based on our job skills, our merit, our success aka our qpr scores. Others were pretty much 2.5% across the board. Since I try hard, study and keep my knowledge base ahead of others. I was in the high performace group and got a 3.5% raise. Not huge.. but compared to today's standards it was a very good raise. I didn't ask others in my dept. But knowing I got 3.5, I knew others had to get less. So the folks who said I know for a fact they didn't give raises based on the qpr scales and we all got 2.5%, that was due to your mgmt team and I think they did a poor job based on your statements. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
Anyone know what to expect regarding mgmt raises?
Top