Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Apples to Apples Please, Mr Smith
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="barnyard" data-source="post: 555248" data-attributes="member: 13921"><p>On the one hand, I would like to see the RLA amended, but on the other..... While Fred is spending time and money, lobbying, we are spending our money getting accounts. Duplicate networks is expensive, let it continue. We keep quite a few shippers because they do not want to deal with 2 or 3 FedEx drivers.</p><p></p><p>I wonder sometimes if UPS plants the seeds for stuff like this and somewhere, someone is laughing and all the energy being wasted on this. </p><p></p><p>I really believe that if the RLA is amended, FedEx could (key word COULD) be an even, tougher competitor.</p><p></p><p>TB</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="barnyard, post: 555248, member: 13921"] On the one hand, I would like to see the RLA amended, but on the other..... While Fred is spending time and money, lobbying, we are spending our money getting accounts. Duplicate networks is expensive, let it continue. We keep quite a few shippers because they do not want to deal with 2 or 3 FedEx drivers. I wonder sometimes if UPS plants the seeds for stuff like this and somewhere, someone is laughing and all the energy being wasted on this. I really believe that if the RLA is amended, FedEx could (key word COULD) be an even, tougher competitor. TB [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Apples to Apples Please, Mr Smith
Top