Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Ben Carson
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 1619621" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>If you are quoting Carson word for word, it would seem your understanding is correct and I would agree as well. Now having seen the video where he made this quote thanks to <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/05/06/carson-president-doesnt-have-responsibility-to-carry-out-scotus-judicial-law/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000"><strong>Breitbart</strong></span></a>, your understanding seems to me is dead on and looking at Breitbart's title of the piece, they reached the same conclusion as well.</p><p></p><p>But in defense of Carson's claim, read through <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleii" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000"><strong>Article 2</strong></span></a> of the US Constitution and show where a President is authorized to submit to judicial authority. The authority granted in Article 2 if one care to even read it is rather limited truth be told and to the judicial branch in <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleiii" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000"><strong>Article 3</strong></span></a> the same is also true. Carson is correct as I read the Constitution and taking it at its word. However, we long ago stopped doing that and we now allow gov't free reign to do as it pleases, Constitutional limitations be damned, so in that context Carson's claim seems over the top.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 1619621, member: 2189"] If you are quoting Carson word for word, it would seem your understanding is correct and I would agree as well. Now having seen the video where he made this quote thanks to [URL='http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/05/06/carson-president-doesnt-have-responsibility-to-carry-out-scotus-judicial-law/'][COLOR=#ff0000][B]Breitbart[/B][/COLOR][/URL], your understanding seems to me is dead on and looking at Breitbart's title of the piece, they reached the same conclusion as well. But in defense of Carson's claim, read through [URL='https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleii'][COLOR=#ff0000][B]Article 2[/B][/COLOR][/URL] of the US Constitution and show where a President is authorized to submit to judicial authority. The authority granted in Article 2 if one care to even read it is rather limited truth be told and to the judicial branch in [URL='https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleiii'][COLOR=#ff0000][B]Article 3[/B][/COLOR][/URL] the same is also true. Carson is correct as I read the Constitution and taking it at its word. However, we long ago stopped doing that and we now allow gov't free reign to do as it pleases, Constitutional limitations be damned, so in that context Carson's claim seems over the top. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Ben Carson
Top