Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Business and 21st Century: UNION not needed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BLACKBOX" data-source="post: 574722" data-attributes="member: 6700"><p>Yes. The NMA states specifically what your job is and when management tries to stray away from that or modify it to their advantage, you have resources and representation if your argument is valid, you don't have that with non-union entities like FDX, etc....</p><p></p><p>But, at the same time I think UPS would love to go non-union. The thought of PC drivers getting paid FDX type wages would send our stock through the roof. </p><p></p><p>So, yes don't even want to know what that scenario would be like, not in this point of my career.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BLACKBOX, post: 574722, member: 6700"] Yes. The NMA states specifically what your job is and when management tries to stray away from that or modify it to their advantage, you have resources and representation if your argument is valid, you don't have that with non-union entities like FDX, etc.... But, at the same time I think UPS would love to go non-union. The thought of PC drivers getting paid FDX type wages would send our stock through the roof. So, yes don't even want to know what that scenario would be like, not in this point of my career. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Business and 21st Century: UNION not needed
Top