Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
C-Pac
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 691668" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p><a href="http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2010/02/21/ron-paul/" target="_blank"><span style="color: red">Paul verses Beck</span> </a></p><p> </p><p>Justin Raimondo IMO raises some good points post CPAC and where if any of this is headed going forward. The shreaking mouthpieces specifically (but not limited too) the Neo-Cons have been asserting the leftward nature of the Paulian right/libertarian and once you disconnect from the republican/democrat, conservative/liberal matrix that is their operational construct and listen more closely to the so-called "True" radical right and "True" radical left without being mentally preconditioned by the empire keepers, you begin to realize they are saying many of the same things and in fact agree. Case in point is again Justin Raimondo but this time at paleo-con magazine "The American Conservative" where he wrote about attending a <a href="http://www.amconmag.com/article/2004/nov/08/00010/" target="_blank"><span style="color: red">2004' Nader rally</span></a> in of all places, San Francisco. Let your imaginations run wild and Justin rightly points out but the real point is what was it that Ralph said to this crowd?</p><p> </p><p>But Justin was a Johnny-Come-Lately as 6 months earlier, Pat Buchanan, icon of the old right, shook up the political world when he interviewed <a href="http://www.amconmag.com/article/2004/jun/21/00006/" target="_blank"><span style="color: red">Nader</span></a> for American Conservative magazine. At the time, Pat's actions was almost the equivalent of Neo taking the red pill but it began a groundswell of folks on both sides of the political extremes begining to find their <a href="http://www.fff.org/freedom/0892c.asp" target="_blank"><span style="color: red">DNA connection</span></a> in 18th/19th century classical liberalism. Ron Paul's 2008' caimpaign further bridged this gap to where so-called liberal icons like Nader or Glenn Greenwald are as app to be linked and quoted in Paleo-con, libertarian circles and the reverse be true where the paleo-left refers to Antiwar.com, LewRockwell and even Mises of all places. It was paleo-left John T. Flynn who joined paleo-right Garet Garrett in vocally opposing FDR and his corporatism New Deal that we still live with the effects to this day. The late Goldwater speech writer and libertarian icon Karl Hess made a very good <a href="http://www.wconger.blogspot.com/2005/08/karl-hess-left-right-spectrum.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: red">observation</span> </a>about political directions and political scale. It is this type free thinking that scare the statist politicos and it's this thinking that's behind much of what is called the tea party movement or the "just leave me the hell alone" movement. If given that demand, the fear is they may take it all to it's logical conclusion and the politico's days of Roman lifestyle would be over.</p><p> </p><p>Underneath the matrix trying to control what the Tea Party is, the 31 percenters who jumped ship with Paul at CPAC and what people should think of it are the actual people who actually founded the movement to begin with and yes in many respects it is a mixed marriage of old right and old left who in reality are long lost children of the same parents. This is what scares the hell more than anything else out of the system mainframe and as a result watch for more and more agent Smiths to emerge on bothsides of the political construct in the hopes of preventing access to the keymaker. Watch the Merovingian (Corp. power) join it's partner the mainframe to obstruct all talk of freed markets and true laissez faire economics too. The Merovingian will advocate for more agent Smiths (regulatory power) in order to protect it's own monopoly/cartel status and the wealth and power that comes with it!</p><p> </p><p>But you can take the blue pill and none of this ever happened and this post doesn't exist. Here, have a cookie and you'll be right as rain!</p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":wink2:" title="Wink :wink2:" data-shortname=":wink2:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 691668, member: 2189"] [URL="http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2010/02/21/ron-paul/"][COLOR=red]Paul verses Beck[/COLOR] [/URL] Justin Raimondo IMO raises some good points post CPAC and where if any of this is headed going forward. The shreaking mouthpieces specifically (but not limited too) the Neo-Cons have been asserting the leftward nature of the Paulian right/libertarian and once you disconnect from the republican/democrat, conservative/liberal matrix that is their operational construct and listen more closely to the so-called "True" radical right and "True" radical left without being mentally preconditioned by the empire keepers, you begin to realize they are saying many of the same things and in fact agree. Case in point is again Justin Raimondo but this time at paleo-con magazine "The American Conservative" where he wrote about attending a [URL="http://www.amconmag.com/article/2004/nov/08/00010/"][COLOR=red]2004' Nader rally[/COLOR][/URL] in of all places, San Francisco. Let your imaginations run wild and Justin rightly points out but the real point is what was it that Ralph said to this crowd? But Justin was a Johnny-Come-Lately as 6 months earlier, Pat Buchanan, icon of the old right, shook up the political world when he interviewed [URL="http://www.amconmag.com/article/2004/jun/21/00006/"][COLOR=red]Nader[/COLOR][/URL] for American Conservative magazine. At the time, Pat's actions was almost the equivalent of Neo taking the red pill but it began a groundswell of folks on both sides of the political extremes begining to find their [URL="http://www.fff.org/freedom/0892c.asp"][COLOR=red]DNA connection[/COLOR][/URL] in 18th/19th century classical liberalism. Ron Paul's 2008' caimpaign further bridged this gap to where so-called liberal icons like Nader or Glenn Greenwald are as app to be linked and quoted in Paleo-con, libertarian circles and the reverse be true where the paleo-left refers to Antiwar.com, LewRockwell and even Mises of all places. It was paleo-left John T. Flynn who joined paleo-right Garet Garrett in vocally opposing FDR and his corporatism New Deal that we still live with the effects to this day. The late Goldwater speech writer and libertarian icon Karl Hess made a very good [URL="http://www.wconger.blogspot.com/2005/08/karl-hess-left-right-spectrum.html"][COLOR=red]observation[/COLOR] [/URL]about political directions and political scale. It is this type free thinking that scare the statist politicos and it's this thinking that's behind much of what is called the tea party movement or the "just leave me the hell alone" movement. If given that demand, the fear is they may take it all to it's logical conclusion and the politico's days of Roman lifestyle would be over. Underneath the matrix trying to control what the Tea Party is, the 31 percenters who jumped ship with Paul at CPAC and what people should think of it are the actual people who actually founded the movement to begin with and yes in many respects it is a mixed marriage of old right and old left who in reality are long lost children of the same parents. This is what scares the hell more than anything else out of the system mainframe and as a result watch for more and more agent Smiths to emerge on bothsides of the political construct in the hopes of preventing access to the keymaker. Watch the Merovingian (Corp. power) join it's partner the mainframe to obstruct all talk of freed markets and true laissez faire economics too. The Merovingian will advocate for more agent Smiths (regulatory power) in order to protect it's own monopoly/cartel status and the wealth and power that comes with it! But you can take the blue pill and none of this ever happened and this post doesn't exist. Here, have a cookie and you'll be right as rain! :wink2: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
C-Pac
Top