Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
Life After Brown
California Supreme Court overturns ban on Gay marriage!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tourists24" data-source="post: 341496" data-attributes="member: 11490"><p>You are making my point more valid here, because you are contradicting yourself here. You say the law could be changing because we as a society are starting to accept more of these types of behaviors and thus, should be allowed. But then you turn around and say that anyone who opposes this is trying to IMPOSE their views on those who believe differently. But isnt that exactly what would be happening if the court is allowed to overturn the other point of view? That's why it is not "spin" to bring in even a more permissive view of marriage. Other people with views of polygomy or beastiality may want to get married also. Why should you or 49% of the voting public be able to judge them. The numbers may be smaller, but it's still judging.</p><p> </p><p>You see, when you take this approach, you muddy the waters and dubb down the meaning of marriage. If society overwhelmingly wants to redifine marriage, then ok. But dont sit there and say you're doing it because no one should be able to force their view on someone else; that's exactly what you are being guilty of yourself</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tourists24, post: 341496, member: 11490"] You are making my point more valid here, because you are contradicting yourself here. You say the law could be changing because we as a society are starting to accept more of these types of behaviors and thus, should be allowed. But then you turn around and say that anyone who opposes this is trying to IMPOSE their views on those who believe differently. But isnt that exactly what would be happening if the court is allowed to overturn the other point of view? That's why it is not "spin" to bring in even a more permissive view of marriage. Other people with views of polygomy or beastiality may want to get married also. Why should you or 49% of the voting public be able to judge them. The numbers may be smaller, but it's still judging. You see, when you take this approach, you muddy the waters and dubb down the meaning of marriage. If society overwhelmingly wants to redifine marriage, then ok. But dont sit there and say you're doing it because no one should be able to force their view on someone else; that's exactly what you are being guilty of yourself [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
Life After Brown
California Supreme Court overturns ban on Gay marriage!
Top