Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Chicago Driver Shot
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="satellitedriver" data-source="post: 572594" data-attributes="member: 1664"><p><strong><span style="color: DarkGreen">Yes, there is.<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/happy2.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happy2:" title="Happy2 :happy2:" data-shortname=":happy2:" /></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: DarkGreen">The company can prove that they keep their facility safe, but at the same time can claim</span></strong><span style="color: DarkGreen"><span style="color: DarkGreen"> <strong>p</strong></span></span><strong><span style="color: DarkGreen">lausible deniability if a driver takes self defense action while doing his route. </span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: DarkGreen">Ergo, simple logic dictates that the safety of the facility/center outweighs the safety of the driver.</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: DarkGreen">Where the logic fails , UPS considers a driver a mere extension of the center/facility. Ups demands that they go into areas that they (UPS) can not control, or guarantee, the safety of the driver.</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: DarkGreen">Logic then dictates that the driver becomes responsible for his own personal safety.</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: DarkGreen">Helluva Catch 22</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: DarkGreen"></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: DarkGreen"></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: DarkGreen"></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: DarkGreen"></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: DarkGreen"></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: DarkGreen"></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: DarkGreen"></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: DarkGreen"></span></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="satellitedriver, post: 572594, member: 1664"] [B][COLOR=DarkGreen]Yes, there is.:happy2: The company can prove that they keep their facility safe, but at the same time can claim[/COLOR][/B][COLOR=DarkGreen][COLOR=DarkGreen] [B]p[/B][/COLOR][/COLOR][B][COLOR=DarkGreen]lausible deniability if a driver takes self defense action while doing his route. Ergo, simple logic dictates that the safety of the facility/center outweighs the safety of the driver. Where the logic fails , UPS considers a driver a mere extension of the center/facility. Ups demands that they go into areas that they (UPS) can not control, or guarantee, the safety of the driver. Logic then dictates that the driver becomes responsible for his own personal safety. Helluva Catch 22 [/COLOR][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Chicago Driver Shot
Top