Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
class action lawsuit against UPS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Iconoclast" data-source="post: 179153" data-attributes="member: 8906"><p><em><span style="color: blue">Like I said I'm comfortable with my point on this subject. Prove me wrong if you can. Again for about the 100th time anyone being represented in a class action lawsuit should be required to physically join the lawsuit and should be required to present evidence attesting to how they were harmed personally. Its a simple point that you seem to be struggling with. The validation of the grievance process would then be certified as part of the process. I really have no interest in expanding this discussion outside of those parameters. </span></em></p><p> </p><p><em><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="color: black">A quick question within the parameters of what you are willing to discuss. If the process for participation in a class action lawsuit is a question of legal procedure-not a UPS issue, labor issue or contract issue, but a legal issue-why hold people responsible for that process? </span></span></em></p><p> </p><p><em><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="color: black">If the law requires, as it currently does, <strong>that you are not required to present evidence attesting to how you were harmed,</strong> why begrudge those who benefit from the law. </span></span></em></p><p> </p><p><em><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="color: black">If you get a traffic ticket and the day you go to court you find that the cop was on the take, and they are going to throw out all the tickets he wrote in the period that they can prove the cop was dirty- are you going to take it upon yourself to make sure that you are prosecuted for your infraction? -No, you are going to walk.</span></span></em></p><p> </p><p><em><span style="color: #0000ff">Again for about the 100th time anyone being represented in a class action lawsuit should be required to physically join the lawsuit and should be required to present evidence attesting to how they were harmed personally. Its a simple point that you seem to be struggling with.</span></em></p><p> </p><p><em><span style="color: black">I am not struggling with it - It is not the law, it is actually one chapter of this morass that appears to be black and white - you may not like it, but you can't be angry at people who benefit from something that they had no control over, and you certainly shouldn't personally attack them for it.</span></em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Iconoclast, post: 179153, member: 8906"] [I][COLOR=blue]Like I said I'm comfortable with my point on this subject. Prove me wrong if you can. Again for about the 100th time anyone being represented in a class action lawsuit should be required to physically join the lawsuit and should be required to present evidence attesting to how they were harmed personally. Its a simple point that you seem to be struggling with. The validation of the grievance process would then be certified as part of the process. I really have no interest in expanding this discussion outside of those parameters. [/COLOR][/I] [I][COLOR=#0000ff][COLOR=black]A quick question within the parameters of what you are willing to discuss. If the process for participation in a class action lawsuit is a question of legal procedure-not a UPS issue, labor issue or contract issue, but a legal issue-why hold people responsible for that process? [/COLOR][/COLOR][/I] [I][COLOR=#0000ff][COLOR=black]If the law requires, as it currently does, [B]that you are not required to present evidence attesting to how you were harmed,[/B] why begrudge those who benefit from the law. [/COLOR][/COLOR][/I] [I][COLOR=#0000ff][COLOR=black]If you get a traffic ticket and the day you go to court you find that the cop was on the take, and they are going to throw out all the tickets he wrote in the period that they can prove the cop was dirty- are you going to take it upon yourself to make sure that you are prosecuted for your infraction? -No, you are going to walk.[/COLOR][/COLOR][/I] [I][COLOR=#0000ff]Again for about the 100th time anyone being represented in a class action lawsuit should be required to physically join the lawsuit and should be required to present evidence attesting to how they were harmed personally. Its a simple point that you seem to be struggling with.[/COLOR][/I] [I][COLOR=black]I am not struggling with it - It is not the law, it is actually one chapter of this morass that appears to be black and white - you may not like it, but you can't be angry at people who benefit from something that they had no control over, and you certainly shouldn't personally attack them for it.[/COLOR][/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
class action lawsuit against UPS
Top