Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
class action lawsuit against UPS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Iconoclast" data-source="post: 181119" data-attributes="member: 8906"><p><span style="color: #0000ff">So the point again if you were not harmed should you collect the money. And If you really believe you are not being dishonest then how do you reconcile with your own personal beliefs in your own integrity. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="color: black">How would you get the money if you weren't harmed? Would the courts allow a settlement of that size to go to people that were not affected by this issue? No. Would UPS settle a case that paid that much to people who had never been affected, No.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="color: black">Again, you seem to want to place parameters on this that the law doesn't require. These are damages that UPS is ordered to pay, read that as penalties, thay are meant to be a punishment and a further deterrent to UPS for breaking the rules. It is not meant to reconcile a specific amount of lunch breaks. The law allows for a wide variance of people to rewarded for simply being in a class. The reason they do this is to punish UPS and to send a message that if UPS had never messed with your meal break, there wouldn't be a case.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"></span><span style="color: black">You hit the nail on the head Tie, when you stated that, </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: blue">"I</span><span style="color: #0000ff"> know many of you have given examples of management you felt were dishonest or unethical. For the rest of us this type of thinking exercise we are going through with this issue is what we who are in management and want to keep our jobs, personally have to do to constantly ensure we are 100 percent correct."</span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: black">Its management who want to keep their jobs, and they will do whatever they can to do that. Does it not make sense to you that if the rules were followed there would not be a suit? </span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: black">Not -"I am going to buy lunch today, or, "our part time supervisors didn't keep good records" This is an endemic problem and because of the mindset that management have to keep their jobs, they do what ever they have to to make their numbers look good.</span></p><p> </p><p>How about the manager that refuses to bend on this meal issue and his numbers are absolutely awful because he is following the rules to a tee? Is he lauded for his integrity?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Iconoclast, post: 181119, member: 8906"] [COLOR=#0000ff]So the point again if you were not harmed should you collect the money. And If you really believe you are not being dishonest then how do you reconcile with your own personal beliefs in your own integrity. [/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff][COLOR=black]How would you get the money if you weren't harmed? Would the courts allow a settlement of that size to go to people that were not affected by this issue? No. Would UPS settle a case that paid that much to people who had never been affected, No.[/COLOR] [COLOR=black]Again, you seem to want to place parameters on this that the law doesn't require. These are damages that UPS is ordered to pay, read that as penalties, thay are meant to be a punishment and a further deterrent to UPS for breaking the rules. It is not meant to reconcile a specific amount of lunch breaks. The law allows for a wide variance of people to rewarded for simply being in a class. The reason they do this is to punish UPS and to send a message that if UPS had never messed with your meal break, there wouldn't be a case.[/COLOR] [/COLOR][COLOR=black]You hit the nail on the head Tie, when you stated that, [/COLOR] [COLOR=blue]"I[/COLOR][COLOR=#0000ff] know many of you have given examples of management you felt were dishonest or unethical. For the rest of us this type of thinking exercise we are going through with this issue is what we who are in management and want to keep our jobs, personally have to do to constantly ensure we are 100 percent correct."[/COLOR] [COLOR=black]Its management who want to keep their jobs, and they will do whatever they can to do that. Does it not make sense to you that if the rules were followed there would not be a suit? [/COLOR] [COLOR=black]Not -"I am going to buy lunch today, or, "our part time supervisors didn't keep good records" This is an endemic problem and because of the mindset that management have to keep their jobs, they do what ever they have to to make their numbers look good.[/COLOR] How about the manager that refuses to bend on this meal issue and his numbers are absolutely awful because he is following the rules to a tee? Is he lauded for his integrity? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
class action lawsuit against UPS
Top