Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
conference call
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Inthegame" data-source="post: 1114423" data-attributes="member: 37112"><p>Tractor? And you say Stink has a cush "union" job? Let's get centered in your lane here...</p><p>Your Local has access to material generated from the IBT that is more pertinent and usable than anything TDU publishes. Ask for it at the next mtg. The "cardinal sin" clause I believe you're referencing is really the innocent til proven guilty language that is used regularly keeping members working during investigations for alleged infractions. Electronic equipment is not to be used as the <u>sole </u>basis for discipline, which when abused by UPS gets cases dropped. </p><p> Remember "good union members" that lose their jobs at panels had to do something wrong to get to a panel, and no one I know has ever lost their job and not been culpable in some fashion. </p><p>Salaries have nothing to do with decisions. Stink was including benefits in his total comp.</p><p>Under the table talk is a cheap shot. Can you supply one name of a panel member "throwing" a case for personal financial gain? I didn't think so.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Inthegame, post: 1114423, member: 37112"] Tractor? And you say Stink has a cush "union" job? Let's get centered in your lane here... Your Local has access to material generated from the IBT that is more pertinent and usable than anything TDU publishes. Ask for it at the next mtg. The "cardinal sin" clause I believe you're referencing is really the innocent til proven guilty language that is used regularly keeping members working during investigations for alleged infractions. Electronic equipment is not to be used as the [U]sole [/U]basis for discipline, which when abused by UPS gets cases dropped. Remember "good union members" that lose their jobs at panels had to do something wrong to get to a panel, and no one I know has ever lost their job and not been culpable in some fashion. Salaries have nothing to do with decisions. Stink was including benefits in his total comp. Under the table talk is a cheap shot. Can you supply one name of a panel member "throwing" a case for personal financial gain? I didn't think so. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
conference call
Top