Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
could this be a case of falsification of records
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="soberups" data-source="post: 709991" data-attributes="member: 14668"><p>We also had some "liars" in management that were editing timecards in order to shave hours and manipulate SPORH.</p><p> </p><p>Did we eliminate the ability of management to edit timecards? No...editing timecards is a legitimate and necessary administrative function.</p><p> </p><p>What we did...was add a level of accountability to the processs by requiring timecard edits to be signed off on by the affected employee.</p><p> </p><p>The <strong><em><u>idiots </u></em></strong>who disabled the "edit" feature in the DIAD did so from behind the comfort of a desk, with no concern for the effect that the decision would have on those of use who actually do the job in the real world.</p><p> </p><p>A better solution...would have been to put a time limit on edits (within 2 minutes of hitting stop complete) or prohibit the adding of additional packages. Or, we could cause all DIAD edits to create a paper trail that the driver would have to sign off on, just like timecard edits.</p><p> </p><p>This would add accountability and prevent abuses, while still allowing us to correct bona fide data entry errors without recreating the entire stop.</p><p> </p><p>I have had situations where I scanned over 100 pieces that weighed almost 2 tons and stacked them on pallets. If I accidentally mis-key "residential" instead of "commercial" and hit stop complete...there is no way to correct this other than to void all 100 packages, void the stop, break down the entire pile and start over. Sorry, aint gonna happen.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="soberups, post: 709991, member: 14668"] We also had some "liars" in management that were editing timecards in order to shave hours and manipulate SPORH. Did we eliminate the ability of management to edit timecards? No...editing timecards is a legitimate and necessary administrative function. What we did...was add a level of accountability to the processs by requiring timecard edits to be signed off on by the affected employee. The [B][I][U]idiots [/U][/I][/B]who disabled the "edit" feature in the DIAD did so from behind the comfort of a desk, with no concern for the effect that the decision would have on those of use who actually do the job in the real world. A better solution...would have been to put a time limit on edits (within 2 minutes of hitting stop complete) or prohibit the adding of additional packages. Or, we could cause all DIAD edits to create a paper trail that the driver would have to sign off on, just like timecard edits. This would add accountability and prevent abuses, while still allowing us to correct bona fide data entry errors without recreating the entire stop. I have had situations where I scanned over 100 pieces that weighed almost 2 tons and stacked them on pallets. If I accidentally mis-key "residential" instead of "commercial" and hit stop complete...there is no way to correct this other than to void all 100 packages, void the stop, break down the entire pile and start over. Sorry, aint gonna happen. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
could this be a case of falsification of records
Top