Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Democrats Test Themes for `06 and `08
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ok2bclever" data-source="post: 74507" data-attributes="member: 1356"><p>wkmac,</p><p></p><p>bush is in campaign mode currently trying to raise his low national public esteem.</p><p></p><p>bush is only admitting that he has broad shoulders and the buck stops here (several years late) regarding the faulty intel.</p><p></p><p>He isn't admitting that the bush team spun/filtered the intelligence to favor the invasion.</p><p></p><p>I call that lying, but I guess a politician might define it as <em>positioning for effect</em> or some such.<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/laugh.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":laugh:" title="Laugh :laugh:" data-shortname=":laugh:" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>tie, feel free to answer any stupid questions you come up with.</p><p></p><p>The answers are likely to be worth as much as your questions.</p><p></p><p>I already answered you that I don't believe the USA should have a policy of invasion set by a number of dead in another country, but feel free to continue to ignore it when you don't get the answer you wanted.</p><p></p><p>You like to try to set up the "By the way have you stopped beating your wife and children, Yes or No?" type of questions.</p><p></p><p>And I know how frustrated you get when your set up questions fail.</p><p></p><p>I do believe in using invasion of a country to stop an imminent WMD attack on our country.</p><p></p><p>In fact, I did agree with that, which is why I am so pissed at bush for convincing us of that lie, errr, <em>positioning for effect</em>.</p><p></p><p>Not that it is a factor in the invasion, but I am wondering where you get the figure about 100,000 WMD Iraqi deaths by Saddaam that you keep repeating?</p><p></p><p>It is reported that mustard gas and some nerve gas was used by both sides in the Iraq/Iran war against each other (with alledged tactical approval of none other than the current bush team member, rumsfield, go figure) and perhaps directly afterward against villages in the Kurdish territory when Saddaam moved to stop the kurd revolt although the facts are conflicting.</p><p></p><p>If you are saying that is the reason for the invasion, we were a few decades late invading.</p><p></p><p>The fact is you personally trumpeted the WMD cry here, even months after the facts showed they never existed.</p><p></p><p>And now you are trying to spin a justifiable reason for the continuing deaths and maimings of all our brave soldiers after your precious WMD story fell through.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ok2bclever, post: 74507, member: 1356"] wkmac, bush is in campaign mode currently trying to raise his low national public esteem. bush is only admitting that he has broad shoulders and the buck stops here (several years late) regarding the faulty intel. He isn't admitting that the bush team spun/filtered the intelligence to favor the invasion. I call that lying, but I guess a politician might define it as [I]positioning for effect[/I] or some such.:laugh: tie, feel free to answer any stupid questions you come up with. The answers are likely to be worth as much as your questions. I already answered you that I don't believe the USA should have a policy of invasion set by a number of dead in another country, but feel free to continue to ignore it when you don't get the answer you wanted. You like to try to set up the "By the way have you stopped beating your wife and children, Yes or No?" type of questions. And I know how frustrated you get when your set up questions fail. I do believe in using invasion of a country to stop an imminent WMD attack on our country. In fact, I did agree with that, which is why I am so pissed at bush for convincing us of that lie, errr, [I]positioning for effect[/I]. Not that it is a factor in the invasion, but I am wondering where you get the figure about 100,000 WMD Iraqi deaths by Saddaam that you keep repeating? It is reported that mustard gas and some nerve gas was used by both sides in the Iraq/Iran war against each other (with alledged tactical approval of none other than the current bush team member, rumsfield, go figure) and perhaps directly afterward against villages in the Kurdish territory when Saddaam moved to stop the kurd revolt although the facts are conflicting. If you are saying that is the reason for the invasion, we were a few decades late invading. The fact is you personally trumpeted the WMD cry here, even months after the facts showed they never existed. And now you are trying to spin a justifiable reason for the continuing deaths and maimings of all our brave soldiers after your precious WMD story fell through. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Democrats Test Themes for `06 and `08
Top