Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Dennis the Menace Gets His!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 1660434" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>If this is all about the crime of pedophilia and nothing else, then the victim is also guilty of hiding a crime in exchange for monetary consideration. From what I know of this situation, it was Hastert's victim that was getting an "out of court settlement" for damages which means he also had evidence of a crime and choose not to expose it because it meant more to him to remain hidden. Also raises the question if Hastert is guilty of removing illegal funds (lack of reporting) is the abuse victim guilty of receiving same?</p><p></p><p>Besides, in this day and time, I'm willing to bet Hastert's previous dallies were known and it was chosen to let sleeping dogs lay because it was worth more too forces of power hidden than known. I would question now who Hastert crossed that brought all of this to light.</p><p></p><p>The act of pedophilia was only exposed as the after fact of the paper crimes Hastert committed of which he is charged. He is not to my knowledge charge with child abuse so it would seem the powers that be are also overlooking that as well. To me this speaks even further against the victimless paper crimes of the Patriot Act when an actual crime against person is committed and not a damn thing is being done about it. Again, to my knowledge. If otherwise, please post up with links to back the claim.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 1660434, member: 2189"] If this is all about the crime of pedophilia and nothing else, then the victim is also guilty of hiding a crime in exchange for monetary consideration. From what I know of this situation, it was Hastert's victim that was getting an "out of court settlement" for damages which means he also had evidence of a crime and choose not to expose it because it meant more to him to remain hidden. Also raises the question if Hastert is guilty of removing illegal funds (lack of reporting) is the abuse victim guilty of receiving same? Besides, in this day and time, I'm willing to bet Hastert's previous dallies were known and it was chosen to let sleeping dogs lay because it was worth more too forces of power hidden than known. I would question now who Hastert crossed that brought all of this to light. The act of pedophilia was only exposed as the after fact of the paper crimes Hastert committed of which he is charged. He is not to my knowledge charge with child abuse so it would seem the powers that be are also overlooking that as well. To me this speaks even further against the victimless paper crimes of the Patriot Act when an actual crime against person is committed and not a damn thing is being done about it. Again, to my knowledge. If otherwise, please post up with links to back the claim. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Dennis the Menace Gets His!
Top