Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
DiadDude///New Diad
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DiadDude" data-source="post: 644097" data-attributes="member: 8166"><p>After a lot of research, progress is being made in securing the next DIAD terminal.</p><p> </p><p>The company had a desire to use "off the shelf" devices if possible with only minor customizations (color and logos). As some of you are aware, there were several tests performed in actual small package operations and that data was evaluated to figure out if "off the shelf" was a realistic goal.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p>All of the terminals tested had the following things in common.</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Smaller and lighter than the current DIAD 4.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Have the display oriented in portrait instead of landscape (taller than wide instead of wider than tall).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Use a 2D imager <span style="color: #2e2e2e"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">as opposed to the 1D scanner in the DIAD 4.</span></span></li> </ul><p>The terminals were of differing shapes and sizes and had a mix of the following features</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">ABC and QWERTY keyboards</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Scanners at various angles in relation to the top of the device</li> </ul><p>The following things were determined from our testing:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The smaller group of the terminals were too small to allow for adequate keyboard space.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Lanscape screen orientation was acceptable for displaying the DIAD application</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The QWERTY keyboard, which has 10 keys in each row, required the keys to be too small to be usable by many drivers</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">2D scanner was acceptable and often performed better when barcode might be unreadable by laser scanner</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The scanner should be at an angle to the top of the terminal and should not shoot straight out the top of the device</li> </ul><p>Now for what's important to you.</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I still lurk on here</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">An announcement of the selected vendor and device should be coming in the near future.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The device is expected to use the same software as the DIAD 4 with some improvements to take advantage of the capabilities of the new terminal.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">There will be no "shift" key</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The signature key should be a non-issue</li> </ul></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DiadDude, post: 644097, member: 8166"] After a lot of research, progress is being made in securing the next DIAD terminal. The company had a desire to use "off the shelf" devices if possible with only minor customizations (color and logos). As some of you are aware, there were several tests performed in actual small package operations and that data was evaluated to figure out if "off the shelf" was a realistic goal. All of the terminals tested had the following things in common. [LIST] [*]Smaller and lighter than the current DIAD 4. [*]Have the display oriented in portrait instead of landscape (taller than wide instead of wider than tall). [*]Use a 2D imager [COLOR=#2e2e2e][FONT=Verdana]as opposed to the 1D scanner in the DIAD 4.[/FONT][/COLOR] [/LIST]The terminals were of differing shapes and sizes and had a mix of the following features [LIST] [*]ABC and QWERTY keyboards [*]Scanners at various angles in relation to the top of the device [/LIST]The following things were determined from our testing: [LIST] [*]The smaller group of the terminals were too small to allow for adequate keyboard space. [*]Lanscape screen orientation was acceptable for displaying the DIAD application [*]The QWERTY keyboard, which has 10 keys in each row, required the keys to be too small to be usable by many drivers [*]2D scanner was acceptable and often performed better when barcode might be unreadable by laser scanner [*]The scanner should be at an angle to the top of the terminal and should not shoot straight out the top of the device [/LIST]Now for what's important to you. [LIST] [*]I still lurk on here [*]An announcement of the selected vendor and device should be coming in the near future. [*]The device is expected to use the same software as the DIAD 4 with some improvements to take advantage of the capabilities of the new terminal. [*]There will be no "shift" key [*]The signature key should be a non-issue [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
DiadDude///New Diad
Top