Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
"economists"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 497829" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>On March 10th, Chairman Bernanke addressed the Council on Foreign Relations on the economy and from his comments, one thing caught my attention.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.cfr.org/publication/18733/conversation_with_ben_s_bernanke.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: red">Transcript of Chairman Bernanke's talk</span></a></p><p> </p><p>As 2008' went on and the obvious came to light that the economic crisis was global instead of just American, there was talk that various leaders and so-called experts were weighing the idea of a global economic system and global currency to replace the various present systems including the global dominance of the US dollar. </p><p> </p><p>From a global economic perspective which completely discounts national loyalities and looks upon human kind as some economic means to a profitable ends, I can see the appeal of such a process. A global economic system would solve many problems and would also most likely necessitate political changes (some dramatic) in many countries to align all law with the new economic paradigm. For those who enjoy war, I've no doubt business would be brisk.</p><p> </p><p>Chairman Bernanke, as word of this direction has leaked around and his own evasiveness when questioned on it, this disqualifier and direct admission to evade the subject again at this time does IMO prove most interesting. There is no hard fast proof either way as to which direction we will head going into the next few years but I do believe global economic leaders and mega-global corporations do bare watching closely. </p><p> </p><p>The dollar as we speak literally sits upon the edge of blade and could go either way. Bretton Woods in the 1940's created a global economic system and when crisis hit in 1971' Nixon changed that earlier agreement. Nixon's decision to close the gold window for good may have been the death neel for that global system and we are witness to it's funeral durge at this time.</p><p> </p><p>Rahm Emmanual said that no crisis should go to waste and when it comes to political power no crisis ever does. Going forward watch closely as our political and economic leaders attend and take part in meetings of an economic nature. Watch <a href="http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/TREATIES.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: red">treaties</span></a> as these have historically been the mechanism to subvert constitutional protections of the individual. It is these gov't created crisis that gov't then uses to it's own ends but behind them are men in the shadows who benefit even greater. Democrat/republican, conservative/liberal are just meer words to them and a hegelian mechanism to be used for a specific ends. </p><p> </p><p>AV mentioned going back to the basics in another thread and he is correct. It's not perfect, nothing is to be honest but there is a mechanism of safety found back in those basics. If we continue to consolidate power at the top, further and further from our local control and closer and closer to the powerful, connected few, whose whispers will be heard in whose ears?</p><p> </p><p>BTW: For the record I do not believe the CFR or whoever to be some super secret conspiracy group. Their actions are all about pushing their beliefs that either benefit their business/economic interests or in other cases their beliefs for a better community of mankind. Usually the better community has a root in a positive to their economic interests. Problem is that betterment of mankind often involves force and being a believer in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle" target="_blank"><span style="color: red">non-agression axiom</span></a> a means and mechanism I oppose.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 497829, member: 2189"] On March 10th, Chairman Bernanke addressed the Council on Foreign Relations on the economy and from his comments, one thing caught my attention. [URL="http://www.cfr.org/publication/18733/conversation_with_ben_s_bernanke.html"][COLOR=red]Transcript of Chairman Bernanke's talk[/COLOR][/URL] As 2008' went on and the obvious came to light that the economic crisis was global instead of just American, there was talk that various leaders and so-called experts were weighing the idea of a global economic system and global currency to replace the various present systems including the global dominance of the US dollar. From a global economic perspective which completely discounts national loyalities and looks upon human kind as some economic means to a profitable ends, I can see the appeal of such a process. A global economic system would solve many problems and would also most likely necessitate political changes (some dramatic) in many countries to align all law with the new economic paradigm. For those who enjoy war, I've no doubt business would be brisk. Chairman Bernanke, as word of this direction has leaked around and his own evasiveness when questioned on it, this disqualifier and direct admission to evade the subject again at this time does IMO prove most interesting. There is no hard fast proof either way as to which direction we will head going into the next few years but I do believe global economic leaders and mega-global corporations do bare watching closely. The dollar as we speak literally sits upon the edge of blade and could go either way. Bretton Woods in the 1940's created a global economic system and when crisis hit in 1971' Nixon changed that earlier agreement. Nixon's decision to close the gold window for good may have been the death neel for that global system and we are witness to it's funeral durge at this time. Rahm Emmanual said that no crisis should go to waste and when it comes to political power no crisis ever does. Going forward watch closely as our political and economic leaders attend and take part in meetings of an economic nature. Watch [URL="http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/TREATIES.html"][COLOR=red]treaties[/COLOR][/URL] as these have historically been the mechanism to subvert constitutional protections of the individual. It is these gov't created crisis that gov't then uses to it's own ends but behind them are men in the shadows who benefit even greater. Democrat/republican, conservative/liberal are just meer words to them and a hegelian mechanism to be used for a specific ends. AV mentioned going back to the basics in another thread and he is correct. It's not perfect, nothing is to be honest but there is a mechanism of safety found back in those basics. If we continue to consolidate power at the top, further and further from our local control and closer and closer to the powerful, connected few, whose whispers will be heard in whose ears? BTW: For the record I do not believe the CFR or whoever to be some super secret conspiracy group. Their actions are all about pushing their beliefs that either benefit their business/economic interests or in other cases their beliefs for a better community of mankind. Usually the better community has a root in a positive to their economic interests. Problem is that betterment of mankind often involves force and being a believer in the [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle"][COLOR=red]non-agression axiom[/COLOR][/URL] a means and mechanism I oppose. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
"economists"
Top