Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
ethics in management
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dannyboy" data-source="post: 327903" data-attributes="member: 484"><p>Tie</p><p> </p><p>Not to jump to Tricks defense, but I personally have seen many times where hourly were at the panel and quiet deals were made. Tradeoffs if you will. To protect several sometimes one must be sacrificed. While not always fair to the one, the others benifit from this type of action.</p><p> </p><p>Not hearsay, but personal experience in this matter. So please dont degrade the conversation saying it does not happen. And I know it speaks volumes about the ethics in both management and union.</p><p> </p><p>As for following the contract when it comes to righting wrongs, I would expect that the company stand would be follow the contract and file file file. But that is what I would expect the company to say. After all, it is the company that asked the union to come in and represent the workers. You yourself have mentioned why. </p><p> </p><p>Now, why would the company set up a grievance proceedure that they pretty much control? To control the outcome. There are no wild cards (well maybe someone like Carey) an the company pretty much controls the situtation. But of course, they let the union strut around with victory on their lips, but those of us that have seen behind the scenes know better. Kinda like the emperor and his clothes.</p><p> </p><p>I would rather take my chances on a serious issue with a labor lawyer than a business agent.</p><p> </p><p>d</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dannyboy, post: 327903, member: 484"] Tie Not to jump to Tricks defense, but I personally have seen many times where hourly were at the panel and quiet deals were made. Tradeoffs if you will. To protect several sometimes one must be sacrificed. While not always fair to the one, the others benifit from this type of action. Not hearsay, but personal experience in this matter. So please dont degrade the conversation saying it does not happen. And I know it speaks volumes about the ethics in both management and union. As for following the contract when it comes to righting wrongs, I would expect that the company stand would be follow the contract and file file file. But that is what I would expect the company to say. After all, it is the company that asked the union to come in and represent the workers. You yourself have mentioned why. Now, why would the company set up a grievance proceedure that they pretty much control? To control the outcome. There are no wild cards (well maybe someone like Carey) an the company pretty much controls the situtation. But of course, they let the union strut around with victory on their lips, but those of us that have seen behind the scenes know better. Kinda like the emperor and his clothes. I would rather take my chances on a serious issue with a labor lawyer than a business agent. d [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
ethics in management
Top