Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Express handing resi deliveries to Ground
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bbsam" data-source="post: 4390382" data-attributes="member: 22662"><p>Well let’s think like a movie lawyer. Murder is a state charge because “My Cousin Vinny” made that clear. Violation of Civil Rights is an offense to be prosecuted at the federal level as supported by the case of “Mississippi Burning”. </p><p></p><p>Now it seems that Roe v. Wade proclaimed a constitutional right to abortion for the woman. But did that right supersede the civil rights of the unborn child? </p><p></p><p>It seems ridiculous until you look at a seemingly unrelated common place happening in drug cases. Drug dealers are often charged with violating the drug stamp act. So in the commission of an illegal act, drug dealers routinely break a law that if they tried to obey, they would self incriminate for the crime of drug dealing.</p><p></p><p>So is it the case that in committing a state crime of “murder” that the federal government has sanctioned, the court also allows for the violation of civil rights of the unborn? If abortion is indeed murder that is legal, it’s commission necessitates the the federal violation which is not legal. </p><p></p><p>Therefore, abortion, legal or not over the years, is proof of civil rights violations of millions. </p><p></p><p>If abortion is murder, why would these women not be tried for violating the rights of the unborn?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bbsam, post: 4390382, member: 22662"] Well let’s think like a movie lawyer. Murder is a state charge because “My Cousin Vinny” made that clear. Violation of Civil Rights is an offense to be prosecuted at the federal level as supported by the case of “Mississippi Burning”. Now it seems that Roe v. Wade proclaimed a constitutional right to abortion for the woman. But did that right supersede the civil rights of the unborn child? It seems ridiculous until you look at a seemingly unrelated common place happening in drug cases. Drug dealers are often charged with violating the drug stamp act. So in the commission of an illegal act, drug dealers routinely break a law that if they tried to obey, they would self incriminate for the crime of drug dealing. So is it the case that in committing a state crime of “murder” that the federal government has sanctioned, the court also allows for the violation of civil rights of the unborn? If abortion is indeed murder that is legal, it’s commission necessitates the the federal violation which is not legal. Therefore, abortion, legal or not over the years, is proof of civil rights violations of millions. If abortion is murder, why would these women not be tried for violating the rights of the unborn? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Express handing resi deliveries to Ground
Top