Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Fiscal Responsibility Going Forward
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 782906" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>In the case of Rand, he's unproven and yet earned his stripes, Ron's DNA not withstanding, so he is fairgame at this point. Ron however is a far different animal and to be blunt, he scares the <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/censored2.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":censored2:" title="Censored2 :censored2:" data-shortname=":censored2:" /> out of both red and blue state statists. If you think Ron will follow some preset ideal that others have constructed, you may not understand Ron Paul like you think you do. As you think you know what he'll do, factor in then how in September of 2008' he could turn around and in front of the National Press Club and the American public encourage, in effect give endorsement, to vote for the likes of Cynthia McKinney, Ralph Nader, Chuck Baldwin or Bob Barr and actually support his position based on only 4 common principles held by all candidates. Now Baldwin and Barr follow a typical construct but how do you explain Nader and McKinney? How do you also explain that Alan Grayson of Florida signed onto Paul's Audit the Fed idea early on and IMO was a valuable asset in that effort. Yet Grayson was no tea sipper by any means much less a strict limit gov't kinda guy yet it's odd you never heard Grayson attack Paul as out to gut the little guy. Why is that? Why hasn't Nader or McKinney attacked Paul in this realm as well? Would it be too much to think that these folks had at some point talked with Ron and he with them and ideas and thoughts passed between them? Why is Paul respected and even welcomed in some left/progressive circles (as he is in many right/libertarian) and yet he still advocates a vastly reduced federal state? At the same time he is equally dispised equally by both the red state right and the blue state left, why is that you think? Why are the Koch Bros. just as vocal against Paul's ideas on economy as Krugman and Company are? Hmmmmm!</p><p></p><p>Ever consider what you think you know is in reality what you really don't know? Ever consider these type threads are illusion busters?</p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/peaceful.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":peaceful:" title="Peaceful :peaceful:" data-shortname=":peaceful:" /></p><p></p><p>Here's some video of that press conference in Sept. 2008'</p><p>[media=youtube]aquLH7yAdWo[/media]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 782906, member: 2189"] In the case of Rand, he's unproven and yet earned his stripes, Ron's DNA not withstanding, so he is fairgame at this point. Ron however is a far different animal and to be blunt, he scares the :censored: out of both red and blue state statists. If you think Ron will follow some preset ideal that others have constructed, you may not understand Ron Paul like you think you do. As you think you know what he'll do, factor in then how in September of 2008' he could turn around and in front of the National Press Club and the American public encourage, in effect give endorsement, to vote for the likes of Cynthia McKinney, Ralph Nader, Chuck Baldwin or Bob Barr and actually support his position based on only 4 common principles held by all candidates. Now Baldwin and Barr follow a typical construct but how do you explain Nader and McKinney? How do you also explain that Alan Grayson of Florida signed onto Paul's Audit the Fed idea early on and IMO was a valuable asset in that effort. Yet Grayson was no tea sipper by any means much less a strict limit gov't kinda guy yet it's odd you never heard Grayson attack Paul as out to gut the little guy. Why is that? Why hasn't Nader or McKinney attacked Paul in this realm as well? Would it be too much to think that these folks had at some point talked with Ron and he with them and ideas and thoughts passed between them? Why is Paul respected and even welcomed in some left/progressive circles (as he is in many right/libertarian) and yet he still advocates a vastly reduced federal state? At the same time he is equally dispised equally by both the red state right and the blue state left, why is that you think? Why are the Koch Bros. just as vocal against Paul's ideas on economy as Krugman and Company are? Hmmmmm! Ever consider what you think you know is in reality what you really don't know? Ever consider these type threads are illusion busters? :peaceful: Here's some video of that press conference in Sept. 2008' [media=youtube]aquLH7yAdWo[/media] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Fiscal Responsibility Going Forward
Top