Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Flavor of the month
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="browniehound" data-source="post: 719588" data-attributes="member: 4653"><p>I agree with them here: reducing backs will reduce backing accidents. How can you argue with that logic?</p><p> </p><p>Problem is, many drivers are going to ignore this warning and just 'chuck' it into reverse and back just because its convienent.</p><p> </p><p>I'm all for reducing backs. Like a previous poster said, "I'll bet I can walk a package off just as quick as you can back into the driveway". These backs need to be eliminated. </p><p> </p><p>After this, how about focusing on using EXTREME caution when backing. If you follow the 5 rules of backing it really becomes a safe and efficent maneuver.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="browniehound, post: 719588, member: 4653"] I agree with them here: reducing backs will reduce backing accidents. How can you argue with that logic? Problem is, many drivers are going to ignore this warning and just 'chuck' it into reverse and back just because its convienent. I'm all for reducing backs. Like a previous poster said, "I'll bet I can walk a package off just as quick as you can back into the driveway". These backs need to be eliminated. After this, how about focusing on using EXTREME caution when backing. If you follow the 5 rules of backing it really becomes a safe and efficent maneuver. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Flavor of the month
Top