George W. Bush Released Terrorist Mastermind Behind the Benghazi Attack!

728ups

728ups

All Trash No Trailer
George W. Bush Released Terrorist Mastermind Behind the Benghazi Attack!
Posted by: News Corpse in Crime, Fox News Lies, World June 29, 2014



Last week Fox News and their Republican cohorts went berserk over reports that Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of ISIS in Iraq, was a former prisoner at Guantanamo Bay but was released by Obama. That happens to be another Fox manufactured lie, but that didn’t stop them from promulgating it repeatedly.



This week Fox News broadcast a report that has a similar revelation buried deep in a story notable for an unrelated, but equally disturbing. bit of disinformation. The article was about the captured Benghazi suspect Ahmed Abu Khattala, who has generally been regarded as a leader of the terrorist militias in Libya.

At least until he was was apprehended by U.S. military forces under Commander-in-Chief Barack Hussein Abu Obama Bin Kenya (as he is known to Fox News and their viewers). Now Fox portrays Khattala as “small potatoes” and “low hanging fruit.” But more on him later.

So if Khattala is not the leader of the Benghazi attack as Krauthammer said, then who was? Well, buried in Housley’s report is the answer. it was one Abu Sufian Ibrahim Ahmed Hamuda bin Qumu:

“He was a prisoner at Guantánamo Bay for more than five years and at the time was classified by analysts at the prison as ‘a probable member of Al Qaeda.’ Despite this significant threat to American security and allies, bin Qumu was released as part of an amnesty for militants in 2008.”


Actually, Housley’s facts are a bit muddled. Bin Qumu was released from Gitmo in September of 2007, and handed over to Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. It was Gaddafi who, in 2008, declared an amnesty and released bin Qumu and other Libyan prisoners.

Either way, it was the Bush administration who sent bin Qumu home where he eventually took command of the militia that Fox News now says orchestrated the Benghazi attack and the murder of four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens.

If bin Qumu had been released from Gitmo while Obama was president, you can be sure that Fox News, and a horde of wild-eyed Republicans, would be aghast at such a treasonous breach of judgment and law, and would be calling for his impeachment (again). That is, after all, precisely the way they reacted to the false accounts of Baghdadi’s release.

But since bin Qumu gained his freedom thanks to President Bush, Fox will never mention it outside of incidental references like Housley’s, which was probably an oversight.

Read the rest of this sordid story on News Corpse, including the new Fox News angle on Khattala complete with blatant hypocritical contradictions by Fox pundits and anchors.
 
The Other Side

The Other Side

Well-Known Troll
Troll
728ups said:
George W. Bush Released Terrorist Mastermind Behind the Benghazi Attack!
Posted by: News Corpse in Crime, Fox News Lies, World June 29, 2014



Last week Fox News and their Republican cohorts went berserk over reports that Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of ISIS in Iraq, was a former prisoner at Guantanamo Bay but was released by Obama. That happens to be another Fox manufactured lie, but that didn’t stop them from promulgating it repeatedly.



This week Fox News broadcast a report that has a similar revelation buried deep in a story notable for an unrelated, but equally disturbing. bit of disinformation. The article was about the captured Benghazi suspect Ahmed Abu Khattala, who has generally been regarded as a leader of the terrorist militias in Libya.

At least until he was was apprehended by U.S. military forces under Commander-in-Chief Barack Hussein Abu Obama Bin Kenya (as he is known to Fox News and their viewers). Now Fox portrays Khattala as “small potatoes” and “low hanging fruit.” But more on him later.

So if Khattala is not the leader of the Benghazi attack as Krauthammer said, then who was? Well, buried in Housley’s report is the answer. it was one Abu Sufian Ibrahim Ahmed Hamuda bin Qumu:

“He was a prisoner at Guantánamo Bay for more than five years and at the time was classified by analysts at the prison as ‘a probable member of Al Qaeda.’ Despite this significant threat to American security and allies, bin Qumu was released as part of an amnesty for militants in 2008.”


Actually, Housley’s facts are a bit muddled. Bin Qumu was released from Gitmo in September of 2007, and handed over to Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. It was Gaddafi who, in 2008, declared an amnesty and released bin Qumu and other Libyan prisoners.

Either way, it was the Bush administration who sent bin Qumu home where he eventually took command of the militia that Fox News now says orchestrated the Benghazi attack and the murder of four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens.

If bin Qumu had been released from Gitmo while Obama was president, you can be sure that Fox News, and a horde of wild-eyed Republicans, would be aghast at such a treasonous breach of judgment and law, and would be calling for his impeachment (again). That is, after all, precisely the way they reacted to the false accounts of Baghdadi’s release.

But since bin Qumu gained his freedom thanks to President Bush, Fox will never mention it outside of incidental references like Housley’s, which was probably an oversight.

Read the rest of this sordid story on News Corpse, including the new Fox News angle on Khattala complete with blatant hypocritical contradictions by Fox pundits and anchors.
Click to expand...


This group is too brainwashed to actually listen to the truth of anything relating to the middle east. If FOX news corpse says it on the air, then it must be true.

TOS.
 
Fedex Guy

Fedex Guy

Well-Known Member
ImageUploadedByBrownCafe1404090628.513412.jpg
LMAO


Just to be clear, I don't work for FedEx. Crazy I know.
 
tourists24

tourists24

Well-Known Member
728ups said:
George W. Bush Released Terrorist Mastermind Behind the Benghazi Attack!
Posted by: News Corpse in Crime, Fox News Lies, World June 29, 2014



Last week Fox News and their Republican cohorts went berserk over reports that Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of ISIS in Iraq, was a former prisoner at Guantanamo Bay but was released by Obama. That happens to be another Fox manufactured lie, but that didn’t stop them from promulgating it repeatedly.



This week Fox News broadcast a report that has a similar revelation buried deep in a story notable for an unrelated, but equally disturbing. bit of disinformation. The article was about the captured Benghazi suspect Ahmed Abu Khattala, who has generally been regarded as a leader of the terrorist militias in Libya.

At least until he was was apprehended by U.S. military forces under Commander-in-Chief Barack Hussein Abu Obama Bin Kenya (as he is known to Fox News and their viewers). Now Fox portrays Khattala as “small potatoes” and “low hanging fruit.” But more on him later.

So if Khattala is not the leader of the Benghazi attack as Krauthammer said, then who was? Well, buried in Housley’s report is the answer. it was one Abu Sufian Ibrahim Ahmed Hamuda bin Qumu:

“He was a prisoner at Guantánamo Bay for more than five years and at the time was classified by analysts at the prison as ‘a probable member of Al Qaeda.’ Despite this significant threat to American security and allies, bin Qumu was released as part of an amnesty for militants in 2008.”


Actually, Housley’s facts are a bit muddled. Bin Qumu was released from Gitmo in September of 2007, and handed over to Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. It was Gaddafi who, in 2008, declared an amnesty and released bin Qumu and other Libyan prisoners.

Either way, it was the Bush administration who sent bin Qumu home where he eventually took command of the militia that Fox News now says orchestrated the Benghazi attack and the murder of four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens.

If bin Qumu had been released from Gitmo while Obama was president, you can be sure that Fox News, and a horde of wild-eyed Republicans, would be aghast at such a treasonous breach of judgment and law, and would be calling for his impeachment (again). That is, after all, precisely the way they reacted to the false accounts of Baghdadi’s release.

But since bin Qumu gained his freedom thanks to President Bush, Fox will never mention it outside of incidental references like Housley’s, which was probably an oversight.

Read the rest of this sordid story on News Corpse, including the new Fox News angle on Khattala complete with blatant hypocritical contradictions by Fox pundits and anchors.
Click to expand...
Well I'll be darned.... It wasn't about a video all along.... Once again,, it was Bushs' fault....lol..... I knew it.
 
bbsam

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
tourists24 said:
Well I'll be darned.... It wasn't about a video all along.... Once again,, it was Bushs' fault....lol..... I knew it.
Click to expand...
well for those of you chanting "Benghazi! Benghazi! Benghazi!" this does happen to be where the trail leads back to. Or are you no longer concerned about Benghazi?
 
R

Rainman

Its all good.
The Other Side said:
This group is too brainwashed to actually listen to the truth of anything relating to the middle east. If FOX news corpse says it on the air, then it must be true.

TOS.
Click to expand...
It's not surprising that Bush friend**d up. Everyone does, and this was a costly one for our people. How about all the times Obama friend**d up, and then lied about it? If you're not going to be fair in your treatment of both sides, then your comments won't carry any more weight than the election advertisements posted in the Teamster magazine when it comes time to elect officers for the union. And we all know how much of a joke that is.


Kmart sux. So does Walmart. And Orion.
 
728ups

728ups

All Trash No Trailer
Rainman said:
It's not surprising that Bush friend**d up. Everyone does, and this was a costly one for our people. How about all the times Obama friend**d up, and then lied about it? If you're not going to be fair in your treatment of both sides, then your comments won't carry any more weight than the election advertisements posted in the Teamster magazine when it comes time to elect officers for the union. And we all know how much of a joke that is.


Kmart sux. So does Walmart. And Orion.
Click to expand...
just for kicks and giggles: how many american soldiers have died due to Obama invading sovereign countries and starting needless unwinnable wars with no exit strategy?
yeah i'm thinking NONE
 
R

Rainman

Its all good.
728ups said:
just for kicks and giggles: how many american soldiers have died due to Obama invading sovereign countries and starting needless unwinnable wars with no exit strategy?
yeah i'm thinking NONE
Click to expand...
How many ambassadors have gotten raped, tortured and murdered, while Bush blamed it on an obscure YouTube video?
Yeah, I'm thinking none.


Kmart sux. So does Walmart. And Orion.
 
728ups

728ups

All Trash No Trailer
Rainman said:
How many ambassadors have gotten raped, tortured and murdered, while Bush blamed it on an obscure YouTube video?
Yeah, I'm thinking none.


Kmart sux. So does Walmart. And Orion.
Click to expand...
wow, you are SERIOUSLY trying to compare the deaths of THOUSANDS of US soldiers to 4 people who died perhaps of the Republicans voting to cut embassy protection?

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) said today that he voted to cut funding for U.S. embassy security amid political attacks from Republicans that the Obama administration did not do enough to secure the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya that was attacked last month.


Republicans and their allies have been trying to politicize the attack — which killed four Americans, including the U.S. Ambassador to Libya — suggesting, without evidence, the Obama administration may have ignored intelligence that the attack was imminent, didn’t properly secure the Benghazi compound and is now trying to cover it up.

But hidden beneath the GOP campaign is the fact that House Republicans voted to cut nearly $300 million from the U.S. embassy security budget. When asked if he voted to cut the funds this morning on CNN, Chaffetz said, “Absolutely“:

O’BRIEN: Is it true that you voted to cut the funding for embassy security?

CHAFFETZ: Absolutely. Look, we have to make priorities and choices in this country. We have — think about this — 15,000 contractors in Iraq. We have more than 6,000 contractors, private army there for President Obama in Baghdad.

And we’re talking about can we get two dozen or so people into Libya to help protect our forces? When you’re in tough economic times, you have to make difficult choices how to prioritize this.

CNN has the clip:
For fiscal 2013, the GOP-controlled House proposed spending $1.934 billion for the State Department’s Worldwide Security Protection program — well below the $2.15 billion requested by the Obama administration. House Republicans cut the administration’s request for embassy security funding by $128 million in fiscal 2011 and $331 million in fiscal 2012. (Negotiations with the Democrat-controlled Senate restored about $88 million of the administration’s request.) Last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans’ proposed cuts to her department would be “detrimental to America’s national security” — a charge Republicans rejected.

[GOP vice presidential nominee Paul] Ryan, [Rep. Darrell] Issa and other House Republicans voted for an amendment in 2009 to cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds for 300 more diplomatic security positions. Under Ryan’s budget, non-defense discretionary spending, which includes State Department funding, would be slashed nearly 20 percent in 2014, which would translate to more than $400 million in additional cuts to embassy security.

“It’s also important to note,” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said last week, “that the Republican appropriation in Congress gave the administration $300 million less than it asked for for the State Department, including funding for security.”
 
R

Rainman

Its all good.
728ups said:
wow, you are SERIOUSLY trying to compare the deaths of THOUSANDS of US soldiers to 4 people who died perhaps of the Republicans voting to cut embassy protection?

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) said today that he voted to cut funding for U.S. embassy security amid political attacks from Republicans that the Obama administration did not do enough to secure the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya that was attacked last month.


Republicans and their allies have been trying to politicize the attack — which killed four Americans, including the U.S. Ambassador to Libya — suggesting, without evidence, the Obama administration may have ignored intelligence that the attack was imminent, didn’t properly secure the Benghazi compound and is now trying to cover it up.

But hidden beneath the GOP campaign is the fact that House Republicans voted to cut nearly $300 million from the U.S. embassy security budget. When asked if he voted to cut the funds this morning on CNN, Chaffetz said, “Absolutely“:

O’BRIEN: Is it true that you voted to cut the funding for embassy security?

CHAFFETZ: Absolutely. Look, we have to make priorities and choices in this country. We have — think about this — 15,000 contractors in Iraq. We have more than 6,000 contractors, private army there for President Obama in Baghdad.

And we’re talking about can we get two dozen or so people into Libya to help protect our forces? When you’re in tough economic times, you have to make difficult choices how to prioritize this.

CNN has the clip:
For fiscal 2013, the GOP-controlled House proposed spending $1.934 billion for the State Department’s Worldwide Security Protection program — well below the $2.15 billion requested by the Obama administration. House Republicans cut the administration’s request for embassy security funding by $128 million in fiscal 2011 and $331 million in fiscal 2012. (Negotiations with the Democrat-controlled Senate restored about $88 million of the administration’s request.) Last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans’ proposed cuts to her department would be “detrimental to America’s national security” — a charge Republicans rejected.

[GOP vice presidential nominee Paul] Ryan, [Rep. Darrell] Issa and other House Republicans voted for an amendment in 2009 to cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds for 300 more diplomatic security positions. Under Ryan’s budget, non-defense discretionary spending, which includes State Department funding, would be slashed nearly 20 percent in 2014, which would translate to more than $400 million in additional cuts to embassy security.

“It’s also important to note,” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said last week, “that the Republican appropriation in Congress gave the administration $300 million less than it asked for for the State Department, including funding for security.”
Click to expand...
So what does that have to do with not sending help when help was requested? And lie about the cause of the attack afterwards? You let your political loyalties override common sense. I don't defend Bush, he screwed up. But you can't seem to admit that Obama isn't perfect and that he hasn't abused his powers of office, and that he hasn't lied to the people.


Kmart sux. So does Walmart. And Orion.
 
728ups

728ups

All Trash No Trailer
Rainman said:
So what does that have to do with not sending help when help was requested? And lie about the cause of the attack afterwards? You let your political loyalties override common sense. I don't defend Bush, he screwed up. But you can't seem to admit that Obama isn't perfect and that he hasn't abused his powers of office, and that he hasn't lied to the people.


Kmart sux. So does Walmart. And Orion.
Click to expand...
you need to get your information from credible news agencies
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/benghazi.asp
Benghazi Bungle
benghazi.jpg

Claim: Various critical statements about the September 2012 terrorist attacks on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya:

content-divider.gif

FALSE: Administration officials watched the attacks unfold in real time but did nothing to intervene.

FALSE: Requests issued by U.S. personnel for military back-up during the attacks were denied.

FALSE: General Carter Ham was relieved of his command for attempting to provide military assistance during the Benghazi attacks.

FALSE: Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaouette was relieved of his command for attempting to provide military assistance during the Benghazi attacks.

Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/benghazi.asp#WoRtHIPyCoIeoZEb.99
 

Similar threads

728ups
Nine Military Officers Demolish Fox's Benghazi "Stand Down" Order Fable
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
realbrown1
realbrown1
Top