George W. Bush Released Terrorist Mastermind Behind the Benghazi Attack!

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by 728ups, Jun 29, 2014.

  1. 728ups

    728ups offending people on the internet since 1995

    George W. Bush Released Terrorist Mastermind Behind the Benghazi Attack!
    Posted by: News Corpse in Crime, Fox News Lies, World June 29, 2014



    Last week Fox News and their Republican cohorts went berserk over reports that Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of ISIS in Iraq, was a former prisoner at Guantanamo Bay but was released by Obama. That happens to be another Fox manufactured lie, but that didn’t stop them from promulgating it repeatedly.



    This week Fox News broadcast a report that has a similar revelation buried deep in a story notable for an unrelated, but equally disturbing. bit of disinformation. The article was about the captured Benghazi suspect Ahmed Abu Khattala, who has generally been regarded as a leader of the terrorist militias in Libya.

    At least until he was was apprehended by U.S. military forces under Commander-in-Chief Barack Hussein Abu Obama Bin Kenya (as he is known to Fox News and their viewers). Now Fox portrays Khattala as “small potatoes” and “low hanging fruit.” But more on him later.

    So if Khattala is not the leader of the Benghazi attack as Krauthammer said, then who was? Well, buried in Housley’s report is the answer. it was one Abu Sufian Ibrahim Ahmed Hamuda bin Qumu:

    “He was a prisoner at Guantánamo Bay for more than five years and at the time was classified by analysts at the prison as ‘a probable member of Al Qaeda.’ Despite this significant threat to American security and allies, bin Qumu was released as part of an amnesty for militants in 2008.”


    Actually, Housley’s facts are a bit muddled. Bin Qumu was released from Gitmo in September of 2007, and handed over to Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. It was Gaddafi who, in 2008, declared an amnesty and released bin Qumu and other Libyan prisoners.

    Either way, it was the Bush administration who sent bin Qumu home where he eventually took command of the militia that Fox News now says orchestrated the Benghazi attack and the murder of four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens.

    If bin Qumu had been released from Gitmo while Obama was president, you can be sure that Fox News, and a horde of wild-eyed Republicans, would be aghast at such a treasonous breach of judgment and law, and would be calling for his impeachment (again). That is, after all, precisely the way they reacted to the false accounts of Baghdadi’s release.

    But since bin Qumu gained his freedom thanks to President Bush, Fox will never mention it outside of incidental references like Housley’s, which was probably an oversight.

    Read the rest of this sordid story on News Corpse, including the new Fox News angle on Khattala complete with blatant hypocritical contradictions by Fox pundits and anchors.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • List
  2. The Other Side

    The Other Side Well-Known Troll Troll


    This group is too brainwashed to actually listen to the truth of anything relating to the middle east. If FOX news corpse says it on the air, then it must be true.

    TOS.
     
  3. Crazy Diamond

    Crazy Diamond Robot Extraordinaire

    I'll bet your a load of fun to be around.

    Peace, HM.


    Sent using a Potato
     
  4. Fedex Guy

    Fedex Guy Active Member

    ImageUploadedByBrownCafe1404090628.513412.jpgLMAO


    Just to be clear, I don't work for FedEx. Crazy I know.
     
  5. Monkey Butt

    Monkey Butt You can call me Chappy Staff Member

    Even more important is that Abu is Obama's son.
     
  6. tourists24

    tourists24 Well-Known Member

    Well I'll be darned.... It wasn't about a video all along.... Once again,, it was Bushs' fault....lol..... I knew it.
     
  7. BrownArmy

    BrownArmy Well-Known Member

    Um...

    Where's the outrage!!!!
     
  8. bbsam

    bbsam Moderator Staff Member

    well for those of you chanting "Benghazi! Benghazi! Benghazi!" this does happen to be where the trail leads back to. Or are you no longer concerned about Benghazi?
     
  9. Monkey Butt

    Monkey Butt You can call me Chappy Staff Member

    It actually leads further back to President Monroe.
     
  10. bbsam

    bbsam Moderator Staff Member

    If they don't care about Bush's involvement, I doubt they will be concerned about Monroe's
     
  11. Monkey Butt

    Monkey Butt You can call me Chappy Staff Member

    Or Monica's.
     
  12. BrownArmy

    BrownArmy Well-Known Member

    Yes, but that doesn't answer the immediate question, does it?

    Context.
     
  13. bbsam

    bbsam Moderator Staff Member

    She's so 90's
     
  14. 728ups

    728ups offending people on the internet since 1995

    Iheard she likes Cuban Cigars,but I'm not sure if she smokes them
     
  15. Rainman

    Rainman Its all good.

    It's not surprising that Bush F****d up. Everyone does, and this was a costly one for our people. How about all the times Obama F****d up, and then lied about it? If you're not going to be fair in your treatment of both sides, then your comments won't carry any more weight than the election advertisements posted in the Teamster magazine when it comes time to elect officers for the union. And we all know how much of a joke that is.


    Kmart sux. So does Walmart. And Orion.
     
  16. 728ups

    728ups offending people on the internet since 1995

    just for kicks and giggles: how many american soldiers have died due to Obama invading sovereign countries and starting needless unwinnable wars with no exit strategy?
    yeah i'm thinking NONE
     
  17. Rainman

    Rainman Its all good.

    How many ambassadors have gotten raped, tortured and murdered, while Bush blamed it on an obscure YouTube video?
    Yeah, I'm thinking none.


    Kmart sux. So does Walmart. And Orion.
     
  18. 728ups

    728ups offending people on the internet since 1995

    wow, you are SERIOUSLY trying to compare the deaths of THOUSANDS of US soldiers to 4 people who died perhaps of the Republicans voting to cut embassy protection?

    Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) said today that he voted to cut funding for U.S. embassy security amid political attacks from Republicans that the Obama administration did not do enough to secure the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya that was attacked last month.


    Republicans and their allies have been trying to politicize the attack — which killed four Americans, including the U.S. Ambassador to Libya — suggesting, without evidence, the Obama administration may have ignored intelligence that the attack was imminent, didn’t properly secure the Benghazi compound and is now trying to cover it up.

    But hidden beneath the GOP campaign is the fact that House Republicans voted to cut nearly $300 million from the U.S. embassy security budget. When asked if he voted to cut the funds this morning on CNN, Chaffetz said, “Absolutely“:

    O: Is it true that you voted to cut the funding for embassy security?

    CHAFFETZ: Absolutely. Look, we have to make priorities and choices in this country. We have — think about this — 15,000 contractors in Iraq. We have more than 6,000 contractors, private army there for President Obama in Baghdad.

    And we’re talking about can we get two dozen or so people into Libya to help protect our forces? When you’re in tough economic times, you have to make difficult choices how to prioritize this.

    CNN has the clip:
    For fiscal 2013, the GOP-controlled House proposed spending $1.934 billion for the State Department’s Worldwide Security Protection program — well below the $2.15 billion requested by the Obama administration. House Republicans cut the administration’s request for embassy security funding by $128 million in fiscal 2011 and $331 million in fiscal 2012. (Negotiations with the Democrat-controlled Senate restored about $88 million of the administration’s request.) Last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans’ proposed cuts to her department would be “detrimental to America’s national security” — a charge Republicans rejected.

    [GOP vice presidential nominee Paul] Ryan, [Rep. Darrell] Issa and other House Republicans voted for an amendment in 2009 to cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds for 300 more diplomatic security positions. Under Ryan’s budget, non-defense discretionary spending, which includes State Department funding, would be slashed nearly 20 percent in 2014, which would translate to more than $400 million in additional cuts to embassy security.

    “It’s also important to note,” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said last week, “that the Republican appropriation in Congress gave the administration $300 million less than it asked for for the State Department, including funding for security.”
     
  19. Rainman

    Rainman Its all good.

    So what does that have to do with not sending help when help was requested? And lie about the cause of the attack afterwards? You let your political loyalties override common sense. I don't defend Bush, he screwed up. But you can't seem to admit that Obama isn't perfect and that he hasn't abused his powers of office, and that he hasn't lied to the people.


    Kmart sux. So does Walmart. And Orion.
     
  20. 728ups

    728ups offending people on the internet since 1995

    you need to get your information from credible news agencies
    http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/benghazi.asp
    Benghazi Bungle
    [​IMG]
    Claim: Various critical statements about the September 2012 terrorist attacks on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya:

    [​IMG]
    FALSE: Administration officials watched the attacks unfold in real time but did nothing to intervene.

    FALSE: Requests issued by U.S. personnel for military back-up during the attacks were denied.

    FALSE: General Carter Ham was relieved of his command for attempting to provide military assistance during the Benghazi attacks.

    FALSE: Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaouette was relieved of his command for attempting to provide military assistance during the Benghazi attacks.

    Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/benghazi.asp#WoRtHIPyCoIeoZEb.99