Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
"get that crap off the lawn"...Oklahoma Supreme Court says...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 1717419" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>You keep saying the second amendment is very clear, but you still cant demonstrate it other than just "saying" it.</p><p></p><p>How CLEAR is it? I gave you this example, and please tell me how you can believe the comparision is different?</p><p></p><p>example:</p><p></p><p>"Overpaid Union thug, a member of the teamsters, working for United Parcel Service, shall not be prohibited from driving a package car".</p><p></p><p>Second amendment:</p><p></p><p>"A Well Regulated Militia, being necessary for the security of the state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."</p><p></p><p>How is the example about YOU, then qualified about YOU, separated by commas, but in the second amendment, you want to take the third fragment out and give it legs all by itself, but giving it the last fragment by connection?</p><p></p><p>How is this clear??</p><p></p><p>TOS.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 1717419, member: 17969"] You keep saying the second amendment is very clear, but you still cant demonstrate it other than just "saying" it. How CLEAR is it? I gave you this example, and please tell me how you can believe the comparision is different? example: "Overpaid Union thug, a member of the teamsters, working for United Parcel Service, shall not be prohibited from driving a package car". Second amendment: "A Well Regulated Militia, being necessary for the security of the state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." How is the example about YOU, then qualified about YOU, separated by commas, but in the second amendment, you want to take the third fragment out and give it legs all by itself, but giving it the last fragment by connection? How is this clear?? TOS. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
"get that crap off the lawn"...Oklahoma Supreme Court says...
Top