Unlike all of the biased, useless articles being posted ....here is the meat and potatos
"As for last week's raid, the government said it had evidence that Indian ebony was "fraudulently" labeled in an attempt to evade an Indian ban on exports of unfinished wood.
"It is very possible that a broker made the mistake in filling out a form," Mr. Juszkiewicz said. Gibson says the ebony was partially finished for use as fingerboards and that Indian officials have endorsed such exports as legal. A spokesman for India's commerce ministry had no immediate comment."
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903895904576542942027859286.html
Wait a sec...everyone is getting riled up about too much gov't and etc...but why is it that Juszkiewicz is backtracking and claiming a "mistake' may have happened? why are they in a civil court trying to take back claimed goods now, is the product
that valuable or is Gibson simply trying to weaken the case against them?
Seems shady to me despite the slanted efforts of social media. Maybe Gibson should do as others have claimed and use a little more due dilligance and research into their goods/ exports purchased.
Sleeve,
It may well be true that the law was broken by suppliers to Gibson and it is true that a similar event happened a couple of years ago in which Gibson is currently in court sueing to get back it's property. However, this is equally true. Gibson based on the 2009' raid was charged with no crime, no arrests were made, no fines levied, no day in court and yet the federal gov't came in and seized property for which at this point no crime is charged, maybe even alleged.
Now whether Gibson is innocent or not, this can be debated but from the standpoint of a legal precedence to the broader population, the gov't under color of law can seize property on the grounds a crime is alleged but no crime is ever charged? How do we square this with the 4th amendment or does that even matter any more? I allege you might have been looking at child porn so on those grounds I seize your computer, never give it back nor do I ever charge you with any crime. Are we not all at risk with such draconian, star chamber law enforcement? Was it not similar conditions that prompted a group of radicals to form cells that came to work and organize together to overthrow such political powers and they felt in important enough to put down something called the 4th amendment in the hopes that it wouldn't happen again? Seems they overlooked some details it would appear!
But the article you posted raises an even greater and deeper question. From the article:
That didn't stop the Nashville-based company, whose guitars are used by such musicians as B.B. King and Angus Young of AC/DC, from running afoul of U.S. authorities over allegedly illegal imports of wood. Though no charges have been filed, Gibson factories have been raided twice, most recently last week, by federal agents who say ebony exported from India to Gibson was "fraudulently" labeled to conceal a contravention of Indian export law.
As in the previous case, no charges have been filed meaning no charges existed at the time of the raid but there is an allegation that Gibson may have violated an Indian Export Law. So the US Federal State is now the enforcement arm of a foreign nationstate? In the realm of legal precedence, think about that.
This has also had a chilling effect on owners of various instruments including Les Paul owners but it's not just them either as other companies use both Ebony and Rosewood too. As a drummer, you know many kits have their shells made of maple (not an effected would, yet!) but this would still not exclude a larger threat to percussionists. Marimba's (a percussion instrument) most often have Rosewood keys so they could easily be effected depending on how far they want to go. A Friday night football game halftime show might change as so many marching bands could lose a major instrument out of their pit. There have been cases where some instruments of private owners during the course of transport have had instruments seized, even with paperwork filed to grandfather in vintage instruments. There is a lot of uncertainty but just unclear at the moment if it's warranted or not.
Whether Gibson here is knowingly guilty or just a case of stupidity for not changing suppliers after the 2009' raid is open for debate but IMO far larger questions are at hand with the legal precedence and ramifications being most important to consider.
jmo
BTW: The more I read about this case, the more I think it's about labor and not about green which is part of my point in earlier posts.