Goldman Sachs driving YRC into bankruptcy

unionman

Well-Known Member
Dec. 17 (Bloomberg) -- International Brotherhood of Teamsters President James Hoffa said Goldman Sachs Group Inc. is creating derivatives trades that would profit from the bankruptcy of YRC Worldwide Inc., the trucking company trying to avert failure with a debt exchange.
The most profitable securities firm in Wall Street history “is actively soliciting bond trades for clients and underwriting credit-default swaps to benefit from a failed exchange and resulting bankruptcy,” Hoffa, the union leader, wrote in a letter dated yesterday to Goldman Sachs Chief Executive Officer Lloyd Blankfein.
YRC, the biggest U.S. trucker by sales, is extending the exchange offer deadline to Dec. 23, after investors holding 75 percent of its debt initially agreed to the exchange, below the 95 percent required by bank lenders. As of 5 p.m. in New York yesterday, participation fell to 57 percent, the Overland Park, Kansas-based company said in a statement. The company said it believes some bondholders have withdrawn because they want to tender their notes only on the expiration date.
The company has faced opposition to its plan to exchange $536.8 million of notes for equity from bondholders who also own derivatives that pay out in a default, according to people familiar with the matter. The Teamsters’ pressure comes as Goldman Sachs is under fire from other labor groups over its role in the subprime mortgage crisis.
YRC, which has posted more than $1.7 billion in losses in the past five quarters, must complete the exchange offer as part of agreements with its bank lenders, the Teamsters and multi- employer pension funds, according to a Nov. 24 regulatory filing.
Revised Terms
YRC has changed the terms of the exchange so that it now requires 70 percent of holders of its 8.5 percent notes due in April 2010 and a combined 85 percent of its 3.375 percent convertible notes and 5 percent convertibles, both due in 2023, to tender. Lenders holding two-thirds of commitments under its credit agreement need to approve the revised offer, YRC said today in a statement. The company said it reached a tentative agreement with a steering committee of lenders to approve the revised offer.
YRC joins companies including Yellow Pages publisher Idearc Inc. and newsprint maker AbitibiBowater Inc. that met opposition to restructuring outside of bankruptcy court from creditors that hedged their holdings with credit-default swaps. Such creditors will typically get paid whether a borrower defaults or not, and sometimes can make more in a bankruptcy.
Workers United
The Teamsters aren’t the only union taking on Goldman Sachs. Workers United, which represents 150,000 people in the U.S. and Canada, sent letters on Dec. 14 to 10 state attorneys general that urged them to investigate the role played by Goldman Sachs in the subprime mortgage market. The union noted that Massachusetts won a $60 million settlement from the firm in May when it undertook such a probe.
Andy Stern, president of the 2.1 million-member Service Employees International Union, has led a letter writing campaign to Goldman Sachs board members demanding information on the firm’s part in the mortgage crisis and whether the companies they’ve invested in are cutting jobs.
Hoffa wrote that “the relatively small benefit Goldman would derive for itself in fees or for clients from such a position is unconscionable given the fact that the 50,000 livelihoods could be ruined by a bankruptcy filing,” according to the letter obtained by Bloomberg News.
No Position
Michael DuVally, a spokesman for New York-based Goldman Sachs, confirmed the bank received the letter.
“Goldman does not have a position in the company, nor are we making markets in the company’s bonds or credit-default swaps,” DuVally said in a telephone interview yesterday afternoon.
Goldman Sachs sent e-mails to debt investors at around 11 a.m. yesterday, after the deadline for the exchange was extended, offering pricing levels on YRC bonds and credit- default swaps, according to people familiar with the matter.
DuVally declined to comment further on YRC or the e-mails.
Iain Gold, a director in the Teamsters’ strategic research department, also confirmed the contents of the letter.
“We want banks to stop creating these derivatives,” Gold said. “There’s too much at stake for the employees of the company. We need to do everything we can to make the exchange successful.”
Hoffa, 68, has led the Teamsters since 1998. The Teamsters union represents 1.4 million members, according to its Web site.
Bondholder Protection
Credit-default swaps are financial instruments based on bonds and loans that are used to hedge against losses or to speculate on a company’s ability to repay debt. They pay the buyer face value in exchange for the underlying securities or the cash equivalent should a borrower fail to adhere to its debt agreements.
In response to labor statements over Goldman Sachs’s role with mortgages issued to borrowers with the weakest credit, DuVally said in an e-mail that “we strongly take issue with the assertions the union makes. For example, Goldman Sachs was never one of the larger issuers of subprime securities.”
During 2006, when the housing bubble started to burst, Goldman Sachs was the 13th-largest issuer and sixth-largest underwriter of securities backed by subprime or second mortgages, according to newsletter Inside MBS & ABS.
It was the seventh-largest issuer and sixth-largest underwriter of bonds backed by Alt-A loans, which are a step higher in credit quality. Issuers acquired and packaged the loans into securities, while underwriters sold the bonds that were created, including those created by others, to debt investors.
 

unionman

Well-Known Member
You guys just keep trying to find dirt on Obama and you as usual come up with nothing. Are you kidding me, do you actually think there is something to that story? If you find any facts, let me know and i'll be sure to say your right about that.
 

JimJimmyJames

Big Time Feeder Driver
Ah Wkmac, another poor soul who has yet to realize that both major political parties are, for the most part, allied in robbing us of our property and freedom.
 

Lue C Fur

Evil member
You guys just keep trying to find dirt on Obama and you as usual come up with nothing. Are you kidding me, do you actually think there is something to that story? If you find any facts, let me know and i'll be sure to say your right about that.

Its tuff to find dirt on Obama....LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!:rofl: Open your eyes Ralph!!:surprise:
 

wkmac

Well-Known Member
Ah Wkmac, another poor soul who has yet to realize that both major political parties are, for the most part, allied in robbing us of our property and freedom.

Yeah, that's pretty obvious but then I think we both knew that before hand. I did like the comment about "you guys" digging up dirt on Obama and the irony of that comment based on the sources of several of the links. I'm with Lucifer laughing on that one too!

Well, if you and Lucifer are game for a little more fun,

The Democrats Faux Fight Against the Banks

How pathetic. President Obama sat at a table surrounded by super rich bankers, pleading with them to lend money to small businesses and workers. The media mislabeled Obama’s groveling as “encouraging,” “imploring,” and “pressing,” but a man who refuses to take action is powerless; and powerless people can only beg.

This disgraceful meeting happened shortly after Obama got “radical” on national TV, calling the bankers “fat cats” and other tough words. But words are only that.

In reality, Obama’s sudden attitude with the banking aristocracy is a shallow attempt to re-brand himself, since the American public now sees him for what he is: a willing tool of the banks, military, and the super-rich in general.

Congress, too, tried to re-cast its image with the banks recently. Like the White House, most American workers now understand the two-party system to be an extension of corporate America. Congress was thus pushed to act. What little pushing was done was quickly pushed back by the banking lobby.

Larry Summers and the Jobless Recovery

Arianna Huffington was right when she said that Larry Summers should be fired. As the top economic advisor to Barack Obama and the director of the National Economic Council, Summers is amassing an impressive record of serving corporate greed at the expense of the public good. Summers reveals himself as thoroughly disconnected from the suffering of main street America in light of his recent statements. On the December 13th edition of ABC’s This Week, Summers cheerfully explained to George Stephanopoulos that the U.S. has “walked back from the brink” following the 2008 economic collapse, and that “everyone agrees the recession is over and the question is what the pace of the [job and economic] expansion is going to be.”

Huffington, who was also a guest on This Week, reacted with scorn: “he’s the wrong man to be heading the President’s economic team. His response is so lackadaisical, no sense of urgency. This is meaningless; Larry Summers’ accelerating his forecast [on job creation] is so utterly meaningless. I don’t even know why we’re talking about it. All his [other] forecasts have been completely wrong.” Huffington’s tongue lashing was one of the few breaths of fresh air in a constant barrage of political and media propaganda that promises the end of the economic crisis is near.

Summers is technically accurate in claiming that the recession is over- if recession is defined as two consecutive quarters or more of negative growth. Data from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis indicates that national changes in the value of National Gross Domestic Product for the last two quarters of 2008 were -2.7 and -5.4 percent respectively, while the figures for the first three quarters of 2009 were: -6.4, -.7, and 2.8 percent. Since the third quarter of 2009 saw limited economic growth, the U.S. economy cannot, by definition, be in a recession. What was most dishonest about Summers’ portrayal, however, is the implication that the U.S. is emerging from the economic crisis. This promise is highly suspect considering that many economists are predicting an increase in unemployment to 11 percent nationwide by next year.

Obama As The Manchurian Candidate

I once wrote an article about former President George W. Bush saying that he was a perfect Manchurian candidate. That is, if his missing year when he was supposed to have been flying fighter jets with the Texas Air National Guard was actually spent in the former Soviet Union being reprogrammed as a covert KGB agent whose job it was to go back to America, win election to the White House, and proceed to destroy the US, he couldn’t have done a better job than he actually did.Now I wonder whether President Obama might not be a perfect Manchurian Candidate of the Republican Party, or perhaps of some nefarious foreign entity—perhaps the China or the always-enigmatic Al Qaeda. How else to explain policies that have wreaked such destruction on the Democratic Party in Washington and on the nation at large.

Consider for a moment the history of this new president in whom so many invested so much hope and enthusiasm:

Almost immediately upon taking office President Obama announced that he was appointing Timothy Geithner, part of the Bush/Cheney financial team, to head up his Treasury Department. This is the same Timothy Geithner who, as head of the New York Federal Reserve, engineered the initial give-away of $85 billion to AIG, and the subsequent pass-through of tens of billions of dollars to a handful of the nation’s largest banks and investment banks—surely the largest theft of public assets by private billionaires in the history of mankind. Obama went on to name a whole gang of Wall Street crooks to run his economic policy, assuring that the recession would be not an opportunity to restore long neglected and undermined New Deal programs, but rather to crush workers and the middle class while shifting staggering sums to the wealthy.

It's truly amazing how low these "vast rightwing conspiracy" pundits will go!

:happy-very:

Hey Unionman, check out these "teabaggers and birthers" and their anti-Obamaism at Black Agenda Report. Even Robert Scheer over at the pro-Obama, Pro Democrat Truthdig admits Wall Street is in Charge. Considering the top campaign contributors to Obama run to the White House, it's fair to believe a good return on investment is in order!

Well with unionman, we've now completed the BC's Trilateral Commission. Photos of Unionman, Island and Tie at their first meeting when someone dare pointed out that there is no difference between the 2 political parties!

images
 

wkmac

Well-Known Member
Hey Unionman,

Check out Bill Moyers Journal this weekend (see link below) or today for that matter on your local PBS station. Bill in the first half of his program interviews Matt Taibbi and Robert Kuttner on the influence of Wall Street and the likes of Goldman Sachs on the Obama adminstration as well as the democrat party. Taibbi sounds a bit more bleak but Kuttner still remains hopeful and both men supported Obama and traditionally democrat politics as a whole.

The interview does make for a good "I told you so" for folks like me but there is an even greater concern beyond that. The Wall Street machine that dominates by force and power what I call Statist Capitialism is a equally big threat to the whole idea of true free market economics (what is called free market capitialism) as it is to downhome populist sensabilities. I might disagree with using central gov't and power to address these problems (mainly because it was this very mechanism that created the problem to begin with) but the fact does remain that this reality will and does effect us all and longterm not in a good way IMO.

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/12182009/watch.html

I did find it interesting that Kuttner points to FDR as standing up to corp. interests when the fact is, FDR let the corp. interests write his New Deal plans like the National Industrial Recovery Act (see NIRA and Who is Gerard Swope?) and of course it was their own business interests who won out and lay the seedbed for what ails us today.
 

diesel96

Well-Known Member
Here's the story that defines our political parties, and those who behind the scenes try to back/justify one side or the other. Clearly conservatives have created a fantasy when it comes to how they define their take on religion, morals, limited gov't, and when it comes to the foundations of America. They look backward to a mythical time when people's behavior was defined equally by Leave it to Beaver, one in which markets were free, women were submissive, and all the colorful elves knew their place. It's not hard to imagine them floating down rivers flanked by giant stone statues of a Reagan on one side and a scowling Joe McCarthy on the other, past temples to Ayn Rand. Conservative utopia only existed in some mythic period outside of normal time, but they are determined to endlessly circle that stagnant goal.
Progressives tend to have more of a science fiction outlook. Sure, we may want our Star Trek uniforms made from envioromentally safe organically grown fibers, but who doesn't long for the time when we can throw away prejudices and break the "stay the course" roles that dictate our lives? An end to war. An end to hunger. A world where the condition of your parents doesn't restrict the possibility of your life. There's a reason that the word "progress" is bound up in progressive (and no, it's not meant to be ironic). Progressives are about making changes, moving forward, creating a world that's unlike the one we see around us with fewer flaws than we see today.
When you look at it that way, it's no wonder that progressives always seem to have the harder path. After all, inertia is against us. Conservatives are content to put their feet down and preserve the status quo. They have both the weight of the world and the fear of change on their side. Progressives have to persuade the unpersuaded to break into new territory, to pack away the past and face a world unlike what's come before. Worse, we are often put in the position, on everything form social issues to the environment, of being the ones that have to say, "what you are doing now is wrong." I don't have to tell you, that's a position that leads to some bruised egos and bloody noses.
So today we have, modern armchair pundits have rewritten the history of the United States, and the similiarities. And just because progressives look forward, it doesn't mean we're always successful. Sometimes we're the ones who get fixated on certain goals, even when those goals are no longer realistic. The results of bumping against the stubborn and corrupt mass of the world as it is can be frustrating. It's not hard for progressives to find failure. We can find them even in our successes.
But a low batting average is the price of science fiction. And even though you may think this sci fi is a remake, there are suttle differences.... JMHO
 
Top