Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Gov healthcare
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="av8torntn" data-source="post: 574470" data-attributes="member: 8259"><p>Actually here I know for a fact that I never did. My opinion has always been there is no shame in voting out your current representative every two years if he refuses to follow the Constitution. I feel it is my responsibility. I have always felt that the two year part was not just some random number. I do however contend that the Constitution gives the Federal Government the right to raise an Army and to fight a war. The Constitution also gives the Government the right to "subcontract" this role. It is the responsibility of the legislative branch to not only fund a war but to authorize a war. A great deal of the Constitution deals with the limits on the military yet nothing on the limits of welfare. I have a hard time accepting the argument that every other part of the Constitution limits the role of Government but that welfare is supposed to be unlimited and unchecked. Like I said just my opinion and not worth anything since I will never be allowed to argue before the Supreme Court. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>I was thinking about the free speech thing today and it may not have been diesel. My apologies if I was wrong.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>I also have no problem pulling back from the foreign fronts( think that was how you put it). How about we start with the places that we are not at war? To me that is a very important distinction.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="av8torntn, post: 574470, member: 8259"] Actually here I know for a fact that I never did. My opinion has always been there is no shame in voting out your current representative every two years if he refuses to follow the Constitution. I feel it is my responsibility. I have always felt that the two year part was not just some random number. I do however contend that the Constitution gives the Federal Government the right to raise an Army and to fight a war. The Constitution also gives the Government the right to "subcontract" this role. It is the responsibility of the legislative branch to not only fund a war but to authorize a war. A great deal of the Constitution deals with the limits on the military yet nothing on the limits of welfare. I have a hard time accepting the argument that every other part of the Constitution limits the role of Government but that welfare is supposed to be unlimited and unchecked. Like I said just my opinion and not worth anything since I will never be allowed to argue before the Supreme Court. I was thinking about the free speech thing today and it may not have been diesel. My apologies if I was wrong. I also have no problem pulling back from the foreign fronts( think that was how you put it). How about we start with the places that we are not at war? To me that is a very important distinction. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Gov healthcare
Top