Well I'd argue common decency but that seldom applies in the world of profit first, people who cares. A twenty eight year employee, most of which was in management, and that's how he's treated for going out on a disability for three months. I'm not questioning the courts decision, I agree they got it right according to the law, but UPS could have avoided the whole mess by giving the guy his last assignment back. It's a lousy way to treat someone after that many years of service.
He is an insulin dependent diabetic and a manager at UPS...I guessing he's got a little stress. All he was looking for was the assignment he had when he left. Not trying to "pick" anything more. He retired when he didn't get the old position back. The courts decision is correct, he didn't fit the criteria. But slice or dice it any way you want and it doesn't absolve UPS it's responsibility of decency.
