Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Halliburton and Bechtel Are Nothing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 297442" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>OK, now I see what you are talking about but first, the wah-wah. Obvious the wah-wah has you p1ssed off and that's perfect. That's the exact effect I was looking for. </p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/happy-very.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happy-very:" title="Happy Very :happy-very:" data-shortname=":happy-very:" /></p><p> </p><p>Now to your cuts. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Now the cuts for the democrats.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>The reason in a sense I read over your cuts in post #25 and looked closer to the cuts just above had nothing to do with favoring one party over the other. The ones above for the democrat were very targeted and specific cuts and I wholeheartedly support all of them. Very nice job. The cuts in post 25 were maybe in your mind specific but they were more general in nature and have for the better part of the previous years in conservative circle been the chief source of big gov't that is pointed at. Since you were so specific with the democrats I thought you would've done the same with the republicans. Repubs I find have a habit of being general and vague in what they want to do so as in the future they think it's harder to pin them down when they do just the opposite of what they said they would do. I can't say this enough, turn off republican radio and start reading the record for a change. Even Rush Limbaugh is waking up and smelling the flowers for what they are and Neal Boortz is now talking about looking at the libertarian candidate in the general election.</p><p> </p><p>Read this Neal: <a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/cox/cox14.html" target="_blank">http://www.lewrockwell.com/cox/cox14.html</a></p><p> </p><p>And for you conservatives consider this: <a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig9/watts1.html" target="_blank">http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig9/watts1.html</a></p><p> </p><p>I mean the bridge to nowhere (benefit of Repub. Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska) is an obvious known but you can't peg the dems. on that one other than the fact many went along to get their own "Bridge to nowhere" in their own district. Backwashing is what it is! As for education, Bush and Ted Kennedy did the same thing with one another in the "No Child left Behind" bill a few years back which at the end of the day grew federal powers within education contary to conservative cries to end the Dept. of Education. Can't blame the demmies of that one now can you?</p><p> </p><p>Social Security? Medicare? Which one of the current crop of repub. beauty queens advocate that idea of ending those programs? Only one with not only a plan to end but also a plan to pay for current obligations into the future since the gov't made that promise and you won't for one second consider that individual. So on that point, your likely candidate for whom you will vote as a republican in Nov. will not in any measure consider that point you just made. If you believe that principle, then why vote for them?</p><p> </p><p>Farm subsidies? Oh man, that's nothing but corp. welfare now. My dad is a retired exec. with some major multi-national agri-businesses and some of the stuff he's told me. Food and Drug adminstration? What a joke IMO and case in point the many recent food problems we've had. Oh, I know, Reagan and the repubs' cut them but the dirty truth is, the whole process is lock, stocked owned by the very corporations they oversee. The FDA's real purpose is to limit free market competition. </p><p> </p><p>Ever go to some of the real estate websites especially for land out west and look at land that has government crop support payments? You'd be shocked as I was. A UPS manager a couple of years back was born and raised in Montana but left when a teenager with hsi family. He wanted to move back in retirement and was looking at buying land out there. He was going to several real estate websites with western land for sale and a lot of them included federal crop support payments to not grow certain crops. These payments in many cases were for a fixed set of years but looked fairly easy to renew and I'd guess if you greased the local politicos, it was done. In a major portions of the sales I saw that had price supports, the fed. check annually was about enough to make the mortgage payment of the land itself and who is buying up a lot of this land? Bingo! Uncle Sam pays the rent and Cousin Corporation plants a crop of whatever and makes a killing. Then you and I pay on payday when I check gets hammered for taxes and then we pay again at the grocery store because the market is controlled for the corporations by our good friends the Gooberment! Now it's time to slam D and EZ! I know it's not what they have in mind but there you have the blowback of the democrat solution to all things (it's republican too but I've been rough on ya so I'll give you something to feel good about) and that is let the Fox guard the henhouse because the watchdog took a powder because he's on the International Brotherhood of Foxes Union payroll and while they sit back eating steak and potatoes, we're having our feathers pulled one by one and then striped to the bone. Oh and trust me, the dems. are in on this as well. Odd is it not that in this election unlike pass elections, the larger share of Corp. money is going to the democrats and not to the republicans. Now whose skids are getting greased now! Bush 1 gave us the buzz word "New World Order" but it was the democrats and Clinton who instituted the economics of globalism. </p><p> </p><p>So you think all the money from those mentioned cuts could as you said:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 297442, member: 2189"] OK, now I see what you are talking about but first, the wah-wah. Obvious the wah-wah has you p1ssed off and that's perfect. That's the exact effect I was looking for. :happy-very: Now to your cuts. Now the cuts for the democrats. The reason in a sense I read over your cuts in post #25 and looked closer to the cuts just above had nothing to do with favoring one party over the other. The ones above for the democrat were very targeted and specific cuts and I wholeheartedly support all of them. Very nice job. The cuts in post 25 were maybe in your mind specific but they were more general in nature and have for the better part of the previous years in conservative circle been the chief source of big gov't that is pointed at. Since you were so specific with the democrats I thought you would've done the same with the republicans. Repubs I find have a habit of being general and vague in what they want to do so as in the future they think it's harder to pin them down when they do just the opposite of what they said they would do. I can't say this enough, turn off republican radio and start reading the record for a change. Even Rush Limbaugh is waking up and smelling the flowers for what they are and Neal Boortz is now talking about looking at the libertarian candidate in the general election. Read this Neal: [URL]http://www.lewrockwell.com/cox/cox14.html[/URL] And for you conservatives consider this: [URL]http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig9/watts1.html[/URL] I mean the bridge to nowhere (benefit of Repub. Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska) is an obvious known but you can't peg the dems. on that one other than the fact many went along to get their own "Bridge to nowhere" in their own district. Backwashing is what it is! As for education, Bush and Ted Kennedy did the same thing with one another in the "No Child left Behind" bill a few years back which at the end of the day grew federal powers within education contary to conservative cries to end the Dept. of Education. Can't blame the demmies of that one now can you? Social Security? Medicare? Which one of the current crop of repub. beauty queens advocate that idea of ending those programs? Only one with not only a plan to end but also a plan to pay for current obligations into the future since the gov't made that promise and you won't for one second consider that individual. So on that point, your likely candidate for whom you will vote as a republican in Nov. will not in any measure consider that point you just made. If you believe that principle, then why vote for them? Farm subsidies? Oh man, that's nothing but corp. welfare now. My dad is a retired exec. with some major multi-national agri-businesses and some of the stuff he's told me. Food and Drug adminstration? What a joke IMO and case in point the many recent food problems we've had. Oh, I know, Reagan and the repubs' cut them but the dirty truth is, the whole process is lock, stocked owned by the very corporations they oversee. The FDA's real purpose is to limit free market competition. Ever go to some of the real estate websites especially for land out west and look at land that has government crop support payments? You'd be shocked as I was. A UPS manager a couple of years back was born and raised in Montana but left when a teenager with hsi family. He wanted to move back in retirement and was looking at buying land out there. He was going to several real estate websites with western land for sale and a lot of them included federal crop support payments to not grow certain crops. These payments in many cases were for a fixed set of years but looked fairly easy to renew and I'd guess if you greased the local politicos, it was done. In a major portions of the sales I saw that had price supports, the fed. check annually was about enough to make the mortgage payment of the land itself and who is buying up a lot of this land? Bingo! Uncle Sam pays the rent and Cousin Corporation plants a crop of whatever and makes a killing. Then you and I pay on payday when I check gets hammered for taxes and then we pay again at the grocery store because the market is controlled for the corporations by our good friends the Gooberment! Now it's time to slam D and EZ! I know it's not what they have in mind but there you have the blowback of the democrat solution to all things (it's republican too but I've been rough on ya so I'll give you something to feel good about) and that is let the Fox guard the henhouse because the watchdog took a powder because he's on the International Brotherhood of Foxes Union payroll and while they sit back eating steak and potatoes, we're having our feathers pulled one by one and then striped to the bone. Oh and trust me, the dems. are in on this as well. Odd is it not that in this election unlike pass elections, the larger share of Corp. money is going to the democrats and not to the republicans. Now whose skids are getting greased now! Bush 1 gave us the buzz word "New World Order" but it was the democrats and Clinton who instituted the economics of globalism. So you think all the money from those mentioned cuts could as you said: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Halliburton and Bechtel Are Nothing
Top