Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Halliburton and Bechtel Are Nothing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="av8torntn" data-source="post: 298331" data-attributes="member: 8259"><p>Ok just one parting shot before I go to the super bowl party.You asked in one post who wants to end social security. The President already tried to end social security. Who led the charge to stop that? You will say he did no such thing. But in allowing people to invest a small part of their social security money and see the effects of this over the long term would have caused people to have less of a dependence on the Federal government as they understood that they could save their own money and do far better than the federal government. People likely over time would start to want out of the social security system. This would have been the slow and less painful approach to ending social security. The democrats feared this. They would have lost control over the poor. While you say they have the best interests of the people at heart I disagree. I think they want to people poor with high taxes so they will be dependent on government.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="av8torntn, post: 298331, member: 8259"] Ok just one parting shot before I go to the super bowl party.You asked in one post who wants to end social security. The President already tried to end social security. Who led the charge to stop that? You will say he did no such thing. But in allowing people to invest a small part of their social security money and see the effects of this over the long term would have caused people to have less of a dependence on the Federal government as they understood that they could save their own money and do far better than the federal government. People likely over time would start to want out of the social security system. This would have been the slow and less painful approach to ending social security. The democrats feared this. They would have lost control over the poor. While you say they have the best interests of the people at heart I disagree. I think they want to people poor with high taxes so they will be dependent on government. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Halliburton and Bechtel Are Nothing
Top