Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
HAPPY 4th of JULY 2011 !!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 854448" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>And you would be partly wrong as well. 2 men alone in disagreement ending in lunch was not nearly as common as you want to allege. 2 men alone proved risky and more often than not the risks far outweighted the benefits. But then man learned a very bad habit in that he could form collectives called nationstates, convince non-thinking people that his way was right and then through the use of force and aggression, these nationstates would then have the other people for lunch. Spreading the risk and often avoiding the risk entirely as others did his fighting for him. After the smoke of the battle cleared, he could move in and enjoy the spoils having never lifted a finger.</p><p></p><p>It is men who seek the means of collective force that are the ones interested in eating others for lunch and it's always been this way. Just as there are those who would point out those lone individuals among us who commit murder and yet at the same time in the name of nationstates ignore the biggest murderers of all who do so in the name of the collective good. I never drew a line of difference between someone who murders to take someone's property and someone who murders others because they won't obey orders and give up their property.</p><p></p><p>Just because you wear a badge or a uniform and not a bandit's mask doesn't mean you aren't a thief or a murderer!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 854448, member: 2189"] And you would be partly wrong as well. 2 men alone in disagreement ending in lunch was not nearly as common as you want to allege. 2 men alone proved risky and more often than not the risks far outweighted the benefits. But then man learned a very bad habit in that he could form collectives called nationstates, convince non-thinking people that his way was right and then through the use of force and aggression, these nationstates would then have the other people for lunch. Spreading the risk and often avoiding the risk entirely as others did his fighting for him. After the smoke of the battle cleared, he could move in and enjoy the spoils having never lifted a finger. It is men who seek the means of collective force that are the ones interested in eating others for lunch and it's always been this way. Just as there are those who would point out those lone individuals among us who commit murder and yet at the same time in the name of nationstates ignore the biggest murderers of all who do so in the name of the collective good. I never drew a line of difference between someone who murders to take someone's property and someone who murders others because they won't obey orders and give up their property. Just because you wear a badge or a uniform and not a bandit's mask doesn't mean you aren't a thief or a murderer! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
HAPPY 4th of JULY 2011 !!
Top