J
JonFrum
Guest
Skippy262,
Ah, now we're getting somewhere. You're talking about the UPS Pension Plan for part-timers in the Central States area. These quotes of yours threw us off track.
Anyway, note that the first line of Article 34, section 1, (i), (2), which you quoted, says:
Part-time employees will receive one (1) year of Credited Service for 750 or more paid hours.
The paragraph you quoted is not new language. It would be a violation of Past Practice for UPS to unilatterally change the definition of hours used in the calculations. Pension changes are a Subject of Mandatory Bargaining.
Also, check your Supplement for a Maintenance of Standards article. It's Article 47, Section 1 - Protection of Conditions, in my New England Supplement.
_ _ _ _ _
My Stewart is in Feeders. He pulls a trailor. He insists his name isn't Stewart. It's Paul.
Ah, now we're getting somewhere. You're talking about the UPS Pension Plan for part-timers in the Central States area. These quotes of yours threw us off track.
. . . I have figured out that under the new agreement everyone of us will never be able to get to the maximum retiremement benefit which we all think we might someday be able to enjoy . . .
. . .
. . . All heath and welfare and retirement contributitions are calculated under "HOURS WORKED". . . .
Anyway, note that the first line of Article 34, section 1, (i), (2), which you quoted, says:
Part-time employees will receive one (1) year of Credited Service for 750 or more paid hours.
The paragraph you quoted is not new language. It would be a violation of Past Practice for UPS to unilatterally change the definition of hours used in the calculations. Pension changes are a Subject of Mandatory Bargaining.
Also, check your Supplement for a Maintenance of Standards article. It's Article 47, Section 1 - Protection of Conditions, in my New England Supplement.
_ _ _ _ _
My Stewart is in Feeders. He pulls a trailor. He insists his name isn't Stewart. It's Paul.