Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
I would like to hear some opinions on this.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jones" data-source="post: 269926" data-attributes="member: 4805"><p>Any google search will return millions of hit, most of which are of questionable value or just not much use. As far as this subject goes, I'm only interested in direct links to scientific research, or as close to the data as possible. That's all that I linked to illustrate my posts. If you really have 15000 scientists contradicting something I wrote then why didn't you post it? I wasn't kidding when I said that all I care about is the science. Instead you chose to post links to:</p><p></p><p>1)An article written by Lawrence Solomon, who was bluntly dishonest in the way he distorted the work done by the Max Planck Society.</p><p></p><p>2)A guy in St Petersburg who doesn't give any clue as to his methodology, no explanation why his conclusions are the exact opposite of the Max Planck Society(whose research methods are transparent), and has never submitted his work for peer review. He also dismisses the greenhouse effect, which doesn't lend much confidence to whatever else he may be doing.</p><p></p><p>3) Off the cuff remarks by a political appointee(your "NASA link")</p><p></p><p>4) A 15 year old girl and her high school science project.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm not a scientist either. That's why I have no interest in debating global warming. My only interest in this subject is whether the conclusions are supported by the research, because if they are then global warming is a problem. If they aren't then I can quit looking at hybrids <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":wink2:" title="Wink :wink2:" data-shortname=":wink2:" />.</p><p></p><p>Posts like the one Char made to start this thread don't help anybody, and no I have no intention of going through it line by line. If you tell me that there are pink teapots circling Uranus, it's your job to prove it, not my job to disprove it. If Char wants to back up everything he said he's welcome to try. I already pointed out three things that were problematic (to say the least).</p><p></p><p>If that didn't clue you in that there was trouble ahead, I don't know what to tell you<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/happy-very.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happy-very:" title="Happy Very :happy-very:" data-shortname=":happy-very:" /></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>You've attributed this to me several times now, which is a little curious because it's something I've never said nor even implied. Can you at least point to me where you "think" I said it?</p><p></p><p>Happy Thanksgiving, and don't let them work ya too hard.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jones, post: 269926, member: 4805"] Any google search will return millions of hit, most of which are of questionable value or just not much use. As far as this subject goes, I'm only interested in direct links to scientific research, or as close to the data as possible. That's all that I linked to illustrate my posts. If you really have 15000 scientists contradicting something I wrote then why didn't you post it? I wasn't kidding when I said that all I care about is the science. Instead you chose to post links to: 1)An article written by Lawrence Solomon, who was bluntly dishonest in the way he distorted the work done by the Max Planck Society. 2)A guy in St Petersburg who doesn't give any clue as to his methodology, no explanation why his conclusions are the exact opposite of the Max Planck Society(whose research methods are transparent), and has never submitted his work for peer review. He also dismisses the greenhouse effect, which doesn't lend much confidence to whatever else he may be doing. 3) Off the cuff remarks by a political appointee(your "NASA link") 4) A 15 year old girl and her high school science project. I'm not a scientist either. That's why I have no interest in debating global warming. My only interest in this subject is whether the conclusions are supported by the research, because if they are then global warming is a problem. If they aren't then I can quit looking at hybrids :wink2:. Posts like the one Char made to start this thread don't help anybody, and no I have no intention of going through it line by line. If you tell me that there are pink teapots circling Uranus, it's your job to prove it, not my job to disprove it. If Char wants to back up everything he said he's welcome to try. I already pointed out three things that were problematic (to say the least). If that didn't clue you in that there was trouble ahead, I don't know what to tell you:happy-very: You've attributed this to me several times now, which is a little curious because it's something I've never said nor even implied. Can you at least point to me where you "think" I said it? Happy Thanksgiving, and don't let them work ya too hard. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
I would like to hear some opinions on this.
Top